В Пнд, 20/09/2010 в 09:16 +0200, Michał Górny пишет:
> On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 09:44:38 +0400
> Peter Volkov wrote:
>
> > Another problem that there is no way to alter ChangeLog. Since
> > ChangeLogs are intended for users it's good idea to be able fix
> > typos / add credits there and thus it's impo
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 09:44:38 +0400
Peter Volkov wrote:
> Another problem that there is no way to alter ChangeLog. Since
> ChangeLogs are intended for users it's good idea to be able fix
> typos / add credits there and thus it's impossible to generate them
> from git commit messages.
How about us
В Вск, 19/09/2010 в 16:17 +0100, Mike Auty пишет:
> It should be possible to still maintain this distinction, something like:
>
> "Version bump. Added feature foo.
> - --
> Feature foo required a complete rewrite of src_install."
>
> And then the ChangeLog generation can happen separately. The
On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 16:10:15 +0300
Petteri Räty wrote:
> One open question is what should repoman do if there is already a
> modification to the ChangeLog file.
I suggest reverting the ChangeLog modification. That's what my
sunrise-commit [1] does, and it works quite well.
On the other side, sh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
It should be possible to still maintain this distinction, something like:
"Version bump. Added feature foo.
- --
Feature foo required a complete rewrite of src_install."
And then the ChangeLog generation can happen separately. The problem
with this
On 19-09-2010 16:10:15 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
> I assume many of us have wrapper scripts to automatically generate
> matching ChangeLog and CVS commit messages. When we eventually move to
> git the plan is for the ChangeLog to be automatically generated from
> git. To unify developer practices
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 15:20, Krzysztof Pawlik wrote:
> On 09/19/10 15:10, Petteri Räty wrote:
>> I assume many of us have wrapper scripts to automatically generate
>> matching ChangeLog and CVS commit messages. When we eventually move to
>> git the plan is for the ChangeLog to be automatically g
On 09/19/10 15:10, Petteri Räty wrote:
> I assume many of us have wrapper scripts to automatically generate
> matching ChangeLog and CVS commit messages. When we eventually move to
> git the plan is for the ChangeLog to be automatically generated from
> git. To unify developer practices and to ease
