David Shakaryan wrote:
> The proposed mirror name is 'berlios' and the three mirrors are:
> - http://download.berlios.de
> - http://download2.berlios.de
> - ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub
Added, with the exception of the third. See my previous post[1] to this
thread for a reason.
[1] http://article.gma
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 23:30:33 +0100 Piotr Jaroszyński <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| > I'm sure all of you understand that not much work would be
| > necessary for the the transition as it can occur over time, for
| > example when package maintainers modify an ebuild. So, what do you
| > folks think?
David Shakaryan wrote:
> - ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub
It looks like this isn't exactly the same as the http mirrors, so make
that two mirrors.
--
David Shakaryan
GnuPG Public Key: 0x4B8FE14B
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Tuesday 19 December 2006 00:09, Matthias Schwarzott wrote:
> I only have one point against this: Has the issue of different files for
> every download be solved?
As far as I know, it was.
--
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/
Gentoo/Alt lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, V
On Monday 18 December 2006 23:00, David Shakaryan wrote:
> Excerpt from the official site:
> "BerliOS Developer is a free service to Open Source developers offering
> easy access to the best in CVS/SVN, mailing lists, bug tracking, message
> boards/forums, task management, site hosting, permanent f
Piotr Jaroszyński wrote:
> I had asked about it once and was told that berlios mirrors are
> unreliable(changing files) and should be avoided. Although things change, so
> is it still the case?
Unless BerliOS changes the URL of one of their mirrors (such as from
download.berlios.de to something
On Monday 18 December 2006 23:00, David Shakaryan wrote:
> I'm sure all of you understand that not much work would be necessary for
> the the transition as it can occur over time, for example when package
> maintainers modify an ebuild. So, what do you folks think?
Good for me..
--
Diego "Flameey
