On Monday 12 June 2006 17:15, Brian Harring wrote:
> B) council
> outcome tomorrow (no point in changing it till they've weighed in on
> the whole enchilada).
not really
it makes people dropping in their own stuff easier and doesnt adversely affect
the portage tree in any way
-mike
pgpouPWaF83
On Monday 12 June 2006 16:58, Stephen Bennett wrote:
> I am also aware that this falls roughly under what the Council was
> asked to discuss in its June meeting, but since that seems to have not
> happened, I'm bringing it up anyway, since I would like to get
> something done here.
we meet Jun 15t
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 09:42:16 -0400
Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please postpone any such changes, if approved, until at least July, as
> we will be doing a snapshot before then, and I would prefer not having
> to spend our entire release cycle just fixing possible problems from
>
On Mon, 2006-06-12 at 14:15 -0700, Brian Harring wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 09:58:01PM +0100, Stephen Bennett wrote:
> > Many things were discussed in the last round of this thread (Paludis
> > and Profiles, in case anyone missed it), and many useful points raised.
> > One of these, which see
On Mon, 2006-06-12 at 21:58 +0100, Stephen Bennett wrote:
> Comments?
Please postpone any such changes, if approved, until at least July, as
we will be doing a snapshot before then, and I would prefer not having
to spend our entire release cycle just fixing possible problems from
these changes.
-
On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 23:09:38 +0200
Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you can spot those issues and fix them w/out rush on package
> mantainers, no problems at all.
I was assuming that they would be treated more or less as minor QA
issues are currently.
> PS: there is a formal spec abo
On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 23:07:34 +0200 "Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Monday 12 June 2006 22:58, Stephen Bennett wrote:
| > I would like to think that this proposal addresses most of the
| > concerns raised in the last thread -- it implies nothing about
| > support for any
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 09:58:01PM +0100, Stephen Bennett wrote:
> Many things were discussed in the last round of this thread (Paludis
> and Profiles, in case anyone missed it), and many useful points raised.
> One of these, which seems to have been largely missed in amongst the
> other noise, for
Stephen Bennett wrote:
> Many things were discussed in the last round of this thread (Paludis
> and Profiles, in case anyone missed it), and many useful points raised.
> One of these, which seems to have been largely missed in amongst the
> other noise, forms the basis of this proposal. It is in so
On Monday 12 June 2006 22:58, Stephen Bennett wrote:
> I would like to think that this proposal addresses most of the concerns
> raised in the last thread -- it implies nothing about support for any
> other package manager, and introduces nothing that could cause problems
> for Portage users, while
10 matches
Mail list logo
