Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: sys-boot/gnu-efi (nt)

2024-06-16 Thread Viorel Munteanu
Hi, I'll take this because it directly affects sys-boot/refind. Co-maintainers welcome. Thank you, Viorel.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs

2024-02-14 Thread Violet Purcell
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 03:47:08PM +0100, Hoël Bézier wrote: > Hi, I’m stepping down from maintenance so the following package is now > looking for a new maintainer: > > sys-apps/bat > > It has two open bugs about failing tests. > > Hoël I use bat, so I'm be willing to take this. I'll look into

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: dev-util/cvise

2023-11-07 Thread Sam James
Michał Górny writes: > [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]] > Hello, > > dev-util/cvise is now looking for a new maintainer. > > It is fairly low maintenance package. It's in need of a version bump > right now, as well as testing with llvm:17 and python:3.12 (both seem to > work fine). > > The main p

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: games-engines/odamex

2022-02-19 Thread James Le Cuirot
On Fri, 2022-02-18 at 15:21 +0900, William Breathitt Gray wrote: > I'm trying to reduce some of my workload to avoid neglecting my other > projects. games-engines/odamex needs a version bump (Bug 833588) and a > minor fix for compilation against musl (Bug 831788). Upstream has been > pretty respons

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: dev-vcs/git-sizer

2022-02-15 Thread Yixun Lan
On 00:29 Mon 14 Feb , Ulrich Mueller wrote: > I am no longer interested in maintaining this package. > It has no open bugs, but is one release behind upstream. > I will take care it -- Yixun Lan (dlan) Gentoo Linux Developer GPG Key ID AABEFD55

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: x11-misc/synergy

2022-02-05 Thread Michał Górny
On Sat, 2022-02-05 at 10:09 +0100, Florian Schmaus wrote: > On 05/02/2022 09.46, Michał Górny wrote: > > Hi, > > > > The following package is in need of a new maintainer: > > > >x11-misc/synergy > > > Note that we have x11-misc/barrier, which is an fork of Synergy. It is > actively develop

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: x11-misc/synergy

2022-02-05 Thread Florian Schmaus
On 05/02/2022 09.46, Michał Górny wrote: Hi, The following package is in need of a new maintainer: x11-misc/synergy Note that we have x11-misc/barrier, which is an fork of Synergy. It is actively developed, as far as I can tell, and works for me very well. - Flow

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: app-shells/kshdb

2022-01-16 Thread Georgy Yakovlev
On Sun, 2022-01-16 at 12:42 -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote: > I no longer wish to maintain this. Please take it if you are > interested. > adopted.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: app-misc/mime-types

2021-12-30 Thread Eray Aslan
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 02:57:53PM +0100, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > Despite my best intentions to get around to fixing this up and doing a > good job of gathering assorted collections of mime types/extensions > into something great for Gentoo users, I haven't gotten very far in > doing so. If anyone

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: app-misc/pdfpc

2021-12-19 Thread Nils Freydank
Am Mittwoch, den 15.12.2021 um 20:23:57 Uhr +0100 schrieb Ulrich Mueller : > [...] > > I am actively using this. So, I'll take it unless someone else wants to > maintain it. (Co-maintainers are also welcome.) > > Ulrich Great, thanks for taking it! Nils signature.asc Description: PGP signatu

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: app-misc/pdfpc

2021-12-15 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Wed, 15 Dec 2021, Nils Freydank wrote: > pdfpc is a nice presentation tool to show PDFs and a presenter screen with > notes etc[1]. > With version 4.5.0 upstream startet to use webkit-gtk and has no intention > to make this optional[2]. I use a Qt-based desktop, have no interest to build

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: app-text/mupdf

2021-10-05 Thread Wolfgang E. Sanyer
I can proxy-maint this if no real devs want it El mar., 5 de octubre de 2021 10:23 p. m., Sam James escribió: > Hi, > > Putting app-text/mupdf up for grabs because I've not used it for a while. > > It needs a version bump (1.19.0) and some minor patches rebasing. > > Please note that anyone taki

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: >=app-emulation/docker-compose-2.0.0 (1.x.x was Python, 2.0.0 is Go)

2021-09-30 Thread William Hubbs
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 12:52:52AM +0200, Sebastian Pipping wrote: > Hi! > > docker-compose upstream has apparently re-written docker-compose in > Golang from scratch. While I'm happy to keep maintaining the current > python-based someone to take over Go packaging of docker-compose >=2.0.0 in Ge

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: dev-python/imread

2021-07-23 Thread John Helmert III
On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 07:42:48PM +0200, Dennis Lamm wrote: > Hello, > > Package up for grabs due to to no consumer in 3dprint project and other > portage package: > dev-python/imread > > It has 1 open bug and a version bump pending according to Repology. > > IMHO: this should be removed from p

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: sys-boot/woeusb

2021-07-08 Thread Marco Scardovi
This project is awesome. I'm wondering if it's better to follow the woeusb (without any gui as it was dropped) or move to the woeusb-ng python version (personally i would prefer this way) Il Gio 8 Lug 2021, 20:18 Matt Turner ha scritto: > On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 5:51 AM Pacho Ramos wrote: > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: sys-boot/woeusb

2021-07-08 Thread Matt Turner
On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 5:51 AM Pacho Ramos wrote: > > No longer interested on it, pending a major version bump after upstream > splitting: > https://github.com/slacka/WoeUSB/issues/209 > > Thanks a lot for taking it Dang! I wish I'd known about this when I had to update my Thunderbolt dock's firm

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: sys-boot/woeusb

2021-07-08 Thread Marco Scardovi
I'm gonna take it up as personally interested of it as sometimes I had to use windows (mostly because family PCs with weirdos stop working) Il giorno gio 8 lug 2021 alle ore 14:51 Pacho Ramos ha scritto: > No longer interested on it, pending a major version bump after upstream > splitting: > htt

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: sys-boot/lilo

2021-06-07 Thread Peter Stuge
Hi Joshua, Joshua Kinard wrote: > > The base system project is dropping LILO: it really needs to be > > maintained by someone who actually uses it. > > I'll claim it. Awesome, thanks a lot. > Never took a liking to GRUB. Simpler is better +1 > However, I am very time-limited, so I will def

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: sys-boot/lilo

2021-06-04 Thread Joshua Kinard
On 6/1/2021 13:43, Mike Gilbert wrote: > The base system project is dropping LILO: it really needs to be > maintained by someone who actually uses it. I'll claim it. I use it on my dev box to boot to ZFS root. Never took a liking to GRUB. Simpler is better, and I honestly wouldn't mind if someo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: sys-boot/lilo

2021-06-01 Thread Hank Leininger
On 2021-06-01, Mike Gilbert wrote: > The base system project is dropping LILO: it really needs to be > maintained by someone who actually uses it. I still use/prefer LILO; I'll take a look at the open bugs and consider submitting PRs for them & taking on p-m of it. An actual @gentoo.org dev is wel

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: sys-boot/lilo

2021-06-01 Thread Peter Stuge
Mike Gilbert wrote: > The base system project is dropping LILO: it really needs to be > maintained by someone who actually uses it. I also use it. Hank Leininger wrote: > I still use/prefer LILO; I'll take a look at the open bugs and > consider submitting PRs for them & taking on p-m of it. Hank

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: sys-boot/lilo

2021-06-01 Thread Philip Webb
210601 Hank Leininger wrote: > On 2021-06-01, Mike Gilbert wrote: >> The base system project is dropping LILO: >> it really needs to be maintained by someone who actually uses it. > I still use/prefer LILO; I'll take a look at the open bugs > and consider submitting PRs for them & taking on p-m of

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: app-arch/snappy

2021-05-05 Thread Azamat Hackimov
Well, with a little patch magic, I was able to make GTest suite as an optional dependency. Here PR: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/20692 ср, 5 мая 2021 г. в 21:09, Michał Górny : > On Wed, 2021-05-05 at 19:47 +0300, Azamat Hackimov wrote: > > Strangely enough, upstream actually released ne

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: app-arch/snappy

2021-05-05 Thread Michał Górny
On Wed, 2021-05-05 at 19:47 +0300, Azamat Hackimov wrote: > Strangely enough, upstream actually released new 1.1.9 a few hours ago. I > don't see any issues with git submodules (there only gtest and benchmark > libraries which can be disabled via cmake). > Anyway, I can take maintainership over it.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: app-arch/snappy

2021-05-05 Thread Azamat Hackimov
Strangely enough, upstream actually released new 1.1.9 a few hours ago. I don't see any issues with git submodules (there only gtest and benchmark libraries which can be disabled via cmake). Anyway, I can take maintainership over it. ср, 5 мая 2021 г. в 12:54, Michał Górny : > Hi, > > The followi

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: x11-misc/i3blocks

2021-02-01 Thread Jakov Smolic
On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 5:42 PM Sam James wrote: > > Hello, > > Packages up for grabs due to the retirement of mudler@: > x11-misc/i3blocks I use it and I can take it. https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/19289 Thanks, Jakov > No open bugs and no version bump pending. > > Thanks! > Sam

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: x11-libs/libfm

2020-08-12 Thread Jimi Huotari
On Thu, 13 Aug 2020 08:49:49 +0300 Joonas Niilola wrote: > On 8/13/20 7:25 AM, Jimi Huotari wrote: > > Unless I'm being blind, the LXQt project does not need this one, > > making it 'maintainer-needed': > > > > x11-libs/libfm > > > Seems to be needed by LXDE stuff only. Regarding that, should w

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: x11-libs/libfm

2020-08-12 Thread Joonas Niilola
On 8/13/20 7:25 AM, Jimi Huotari wrote: > Unless I'm being blind, the LXQt project does not need this one, making it > 'maintainer-needed': > > x11-libs/libfm > Seems to be needed by LXDE stuff only. Regarding that, should we last-rite remaining LXDE stuff? It's pretty clear the development has sh

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: dev-cpp/asio

2020-06-02 Thread Alexey Sokolov
вт, 2 июн. 2020 г. в 02:27, Stefan Strogin : > > Hi, > > I don't use dev-cpp/asio or any of its reverse dependencies any longer. > > CC to mysql-bugs, because sys-cluster/galera depends on dev-cpp/asio. > Hi. I can take it unless someone else wants to.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: net-im/prosody

2020-05-11 Thread Haelwenn (lanodan) Monnier
[2020-05-11 12:39:05+0200] Tobias Klausmann: > Hi! > > As per subject. I am not running any Jabber infrastructure > anymore. > > Package is in decent shape. Lua 5.2 compatibility is not there, > but I don't see 5.2 happening soon anyway. The rest of the bugs > are nice-to-haves and cosmetic stuf

Re: [gentoo-dev] package up for grabs: net-news/newsboat

2020-04-25 Thread Cédric Krier
On 2020-04-05 19:52, Georgy Yakovlev wrote: > No longer use it. > Needs a minor bump, upstream changed doc dependency to asciidoctor. > Uses custom build system and rust, > may be tricky to maintain, but I can help. > > Couple of open bugs: arm keywording and musl related build falure. > > net-ne

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: dev-libs/ppl

2020-04-13 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 4/13/20 4:55 AM, Sergei Trofimovich wrote: > Single fresh test failure bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/717258. I took it, there are some known arch-specific test failures on the upstream bug tracker that I'll try to temporarily patch out.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: sys-cluster/kubectl

2020-01-15 Thread William Hubbs
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 10:41:30AM +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > Due to the maintainer retiring, the following package is orphaned now: > > sys-cluster/kubectl I'll grab this since I'm maintaining the rest of kubernetes. William > > FWICS it has a single bug filed and needs a minor version bu

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: app-arch/unar

2019-12-10 Thread Hanno Böck
On Mon, 09 Dec 2019 19:56:40 +0100 Dennis Schridde wrote: > app-arch/unar currently seems to be the only free choice for kde-apps/ > kdeutils-meta-19.08.3[rar]: > rar? ( || ( > app-arch/rar > app-arch/unrar > app-arch/unar > ) ) I b

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: app-arch/unar

2019-12-09 Thread Dennis Schridde
On Montag, 9. Dezember 2019 13:03:02 CET Hanno Böck wrote: > It's an archive unpacker written in objective C, which makes it > dependency-heavy (particularly requires gcc compiled with objc). > I originally got interested because it was the only free unpacker > capable of handling modern rar archiv

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: sys-firmware/iwl1000-ucode

2019-11-18 Thread Brian Evans
On 11/16/2019 3:14 PM, Matt Turner wrote: > On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 9:08 AM Michael 'veremitz' Everitt > wrote: >> >> On 16/11/19 16:59, Matt Turner wrote: >>> On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 1:06 AM Jaco Kroon wrote: Hi, On 2019/11/15 21:35, Matt Turner wrote: > On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: sys-firmware/iwl1000-ucode

2019-11-16 Thread Matt Turner
On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 9:08 AM Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote: > > On 16/11/19 16:59, Matt Turner wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 1:06 AM Jaco Kroon wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> On 2019/11/15 21:35, Matt Turner wrote: > >>> On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 2:20 AM Ulrich Mueller wrote: > The pack

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: sys-firmware/iwl1000-ucode

2019-11-16 Thread Jaco Kroon
Hi, On 2019/11/16 19:08, Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote: > On 16/11/19 16:59, Matt Turner wrote: >> On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 1:06 AM Jaco Kroon wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On 2019/11/15 21:35, Matt Turner wrote: On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 2:20 AM Ulrich Mueller wrote: > The package is somewhat

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: sys-firmware/iwl1000-ucode

2019-11-16 Thread Michael 'veremitz' Everitt
On 16/11/19 16:59, Matt Turner wrote: > On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 1:06 AM Jaco Kroon wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 2019/11/15 21:35, Matt Turner wrote: >>> On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 2:20 AM Ulrich Mueller wrote: The package is somewhat redundant, because sys-kernel/linux-firmware installs the same

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: sys-firmware/iwl1000-ucode

2019-11-16 Thread Matt Turner
On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 1:06 AM Jaco Kroon wrote: > > Hi, > > On 2019/11/15 21:35, Matt Turner wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 2:20 AM Ulrich Mueller wrote: > >> The package is somewhat redundant, because sys-kernel/linux-firmware > >> installs the same files. (Same for all other sys-firmware/

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: sys-firmware/iwl1000-ucode

2019-11-16 Thread Haelwenn (lanodan) Monnier
[2019-11-16 11:05:54+0200] Jaco Kroon: > On 2019/11/15 21:35, Matt Turner wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 2:20 AM Ulrich Mueller wrote: > >> The package is somewhat redundant, because sys-kernel/linux-firmware > >> installs the same files. (Same for all other sys-firmware/iwl*-ucode > >> packag

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: sys-firmware/iwl1000-ucode

2019-11-16 Thread Jaco Kroon
Hi, On 2019/11/15 21:35, Matt Turner wrote: > On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 2:20 AM Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> The package is somewhat redundant, because sys-kernel/linux-firmware >> installs the same files. (Same for all other sys-firmware/iwl*-ucode >> packages.) > Should last-rite all of them, IMO. >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: sys-firmware/iwl1000-ucode

2019-11-15 Thread Matt Turner
On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 2:20 AM Ulrich Mueller wrote: > The package is somewhat redundant, because sys-kernel/linux-firmware > installs the same files. (Same for all other sys-firmware/iwl*-ucode > packages.) Should last-rite all of them, IMO.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: sys-apps/lsb-release

2019-11-07 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
On 2019-11-07 18:57, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > sys-apps/lsb-release - Linux Standard Base version query program > > Low maintenance, but with six open bug reports. base-system will take that package. -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: dev-util/rbtools

2019-09-27 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Fri, 2019-09-06 at 20:32 +0200, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote: > > KDE proj was maintaining this for contributing to kde.org's > reviewboard > instance only. This is long obsolete and we have no use for it > anymore. I'll take this since we use this at work and I already maintain reviewboard ebu

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: media-tv/tvheadend

2018-04-10 Thread James Le Cuirot
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 11:19:55 +1000 Sam Jorna wrote: > Due to not having as much time as I'd hoped, media-tv/tvheadend is > being dropped to maintainer-needed. Mine! :) As you know, I did some work on it last year. I haven't been using it quite as much as I expected to by this point but hopefully

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: games-engines/love

2018-02-06 Thread kuzetsa
From freenode / #gentoo-proxy-maint [09:13:53] do I need to reply to the gentoo-dev ML to be able to proxy-maintain games-engines/love or can I just fire off the github PR with commits for EAPI 6, version bump, etc. (it's not up to date & being dropped by current maintainer) Resolution: It

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: net-ftp/atftp

2017-10-30 Thread Jonas Stein
> I haven't used atftp in a *long* time and upstream is either dead > or has entered a time capsule on SF.net. > > Open bugs: https://bugs.gentoo.org/513486 net-ftp/atftp - increase BKLSIZE https://bugs.gentoo.org/635786 net-ftp/atftp-0.7-r5 : neither HOMEPAGE nor originalSRC_URI available any mo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: net-ftp/atftp

2017-10-30 Thread James Le Cuirot
On Mon, 30 Oct 2017 09:32:17 +0100 Matthias Hanft wrote: > Tobias Klausmann wrote: > > > > I haven't used atftp in a *long* time and upstream is either dead > > or has entered a time capsule on SF.net. > > I am considering last-riting it right away > > I'm still using it every day (our PBX up

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: net-ftp/atftp

2017-10-30 Thread Matthias Hanft
Tobias Klausmann wrote: > > I haven't used atftp in a *long* time and upstream is either dead > or has entered a time capsule on SF.net. > I am considering last-riting it right away I'm still using it every day (our PBX uploads its accounting tickets to our Gentoo server using TFTP). If it's gon

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs

2017-08-23 Thread Peter Stuge
Michał Górny wrote: > W dniu nie, 23.07.2017 o godzinie 16∶13 +0200, użytkownik Manuel Rüger > napisał: > > dev-libs/libgit2 > > I'm going to co-maintain this with the full set (-glib, pygit2). I've > used it in the past, and I think it'll still come in handy > in the future. I too have some inte

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs

2017-08-23 Thread Michał Górny
W dniu nie, 23.07.2017 o godzinie 16∶13 +0200, użytkownik Manuel Rüger napisał: > dev-libs/libgit2 I'm going to co-maintain this with the full set (-glib, pygit2). I've used it in the past, and I think it'll still come in handy in the future. > net-libs/libssh2 > I'll co-maintain this as well a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs

2017-08-22 Thread Mart Raudsepp
Ühel kenal päeval, P, 23.07.2017 kell 16:13, kirjutas Manuel Rüger: > The following packages are up for grabs: > dev-libs/libgit2 We've taken this under gnome@g.o as we need to keep this in sync with dev-libs/libgit2-glib and dev-vcs/gitg anyways. We should notice bump needs once a compatible lib

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: net-dns/dnscrypt-proxy

2017-08-16 Thread Georgy Yakovlev
Hi, I'd like to take this one. Currently working on the new version and submitted a pull request. https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/5346 My proxy is Polynomial-C@ Regards, Georgy Yakovlev On 08/16/2017 08:47 PM, Gokturk Yuksek wrote: > Hi, > > The following package is up for grabs: > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs

2017-08-08 Thread tomjbe
Quoting Daniel Campbell (2017-08-07 22:38:53) > On 08/06/2017 02:27 AM, tom...@gentoo.org wrote: > > Quoting Daniel Campbell (2017-07-31 04:16:30) > >> On 07/19/2017 02:33 AM, Amy Liffey wrote: ... > >> > > Ok, as I have done some quite Forth programming in the past, let me step in. > > > > Thomas

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs

2017-08-07 Thread Daniel Campbell
On 08/06/2017 02:27 AM, tom...@gentoo.org wrote: > Quoting Daniel Campbell (2017-07-31 04:16:30) >> On 07/19/2017 02:33 AM, Amy Liffey wrote: >>> The following package is up for grabs: >>> >>> dev-lang/gforth >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Amy Liffey >>> >> I can take this one; I'd hate to see Forth sup

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs

2017-08-06 Thread tomjbe
Quoting Daniel Campbell (2017-07-31 04:16:30) > On 07/19/2017 02:33 AM, Amy Liffey wrote: > > The following package is up for grabs: > > > > dev-lang/gforth > > > > Best regards, > > Amy Liffey > > > I can take this one; I'd hate to see Forth support go missing on Gentoo. > I'm open to co-mainta

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs

2017-07-30 Thread Matthew Thode
On 17-07-30 14:24:50, Daniel Campbell wrote: > On 07/23/2017 07:13 AM, Manuel Rüger wrote: > > The following packages are up for grabs: > > > > app-admin/gixy > > app-admin/mei-amt-check > > app-admin/ngxtop > > app-admin/passwordsafe > > app-arch/lz5 > > app-crypt/acme > > app-crypt/certbot > > a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs

2017-07-30 Thread Daniel Campbell
On 07/19/2017 02:33 AM, Amy Liffey wrote: > The following package is up for grabs: > > dev-lang/gforth > > Best regards, > Amy Liffey > I can take this one; I'd hate to see Forth support go missing on Gentoo. I'm open to co-maintainers as well. ~zlg -- Daniel Campbell - Gentoo Developer OpenP

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs

2017-07-30 Thread Daniel Campbell
On 07/23/2017 07:13 AM, Manuel Rüger wrote: > The following packages are up for grabs: > > app-admin/gixy > app-admin/mei-amt-check > app-admin/ngxtop > app-admin/passwordsafe > app-arch/lz5 > app-crypt/acme > app-crypt/certbot > app-crypt/certbot-apache > app-crypt/certbot-nginx > app-crypt/easy-

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs

2017-07-30 Thread Cédric Krier
On 2017-07-23 16:13, Manuel Rüger wrote: > The following packages are up for grabs: > dev-util/cookiecutter I will take this one as I used it. -- Cédric Krier signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] package up for grabs: mail-filter/spambayes

2017-07-11 Thread Thomas - LordVan - Raschbacher
Am 11.07.2017 um 15:21 schrieb Igor Savlook: > On Tue, 2017-07-11 at 07:28 +0200, Thomas - LordVan - Raschbacher > wrote: >> Hi. >> >> I decided to either give up maintainership of spambayes (not that >> there >> were any releases in the last 5+ years anyway). >> >> Anyone interested? if not I'll c

Re: [gentoo-dev] package up for grabs: mail-filter/spambayes

2017-07-11 Thread Igor Savlook
On Tue, 2017-07-11 at 07:28 +0200, Thomas - LordVan - Raschbacher wrote: > Hi. > > I decided to either give up maintainership of spambayes (not that > there > were any releases in the last 5+ years anyway). > > Anyone interested? if not I'll change it to maintainer-needed (or > maybe > just treec

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: net-vpn/libreswan

2017-05-19 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Sun, 2017-05-07 at 15:28 -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote: > I used to use this package for an IPSec/L2TP VPN to my office, but we > migrated onto Cisco AnyConnect. I now use net-vpn/openconnect > regularly and have not been able to test libreswan since the switch. > > libreswan has no open bugs, but

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: x11-misc/ktsuss

2017-02-15 Thread Daniel Campbell
On 01/25/2017 01:17 PM, Gokturk Yuksek wrote: > The following package is up for grabs: > > x11-misc/ktsuss > I can take this; I use it with SpaceFM to do things as root. -- Daniel Campbell - Gentoo Developer OpenPGP Key: 0x1EA055D6 @ hkp://keys.gnupg.net fpr: AE03 9064 AE00 053C 270C 1DE4 6F

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: media-gfx/displaycal

2017-01-03 Thread Bernard Cafarelli
Le 22/12/2016 11:56, Gokturk Yuksek a écrit : Hi, This a slightly delayed up for grabs notice for: media-gfx/displaycal ArgyllCMS is already in my list, so I can help with this one too. But co-maintainers are still welcome of course! -- Bernard Cafarelli (Voyageur) Gentoo developer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: games-strategy/freeorion

2016-10-18 Thread NP-Hardass
On 10/16/2016 03:15 PM, Thomas Kahle wrote: > Hi, > > games-strategy/freeorion is a space empire and galactic conquest > game inspired by Master of Orion (though not a clone): > http://www.freeorion.org > > I cannot maintain it anymore, the main reason being that I don't > have a gentoo machine w

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: skencil

2016-09-16 Thread Kristian Fiskerstrand
On 09/16/2016 02:31 PM, Hanno Böck wrote: > media-gfx/skencil > is a python-written vector graphics tool. It was once popular before > inkscape became the de-facto-standard. It hasn't seen any upstream > activity for a decade(!), but surprisingly it still seems to work. > > I haven't used it for m

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs

2016-08-27 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Wed, 2016-08-24 at 15:26 +0200, Lars Wendler wrote: > This package is now up for grabs: > net-irc/rbot I've added this package to the ruby project, but a more dedicated maintainer would still be welcome. Hans signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs

2016-05-30 Thread Michał Górny
On Tue, 31 May 2016 08:43:55 +0800 (HKT) Brendan Horan wrote: > Hi, > > I am currently the proxy maintainer for app-arch/snappy. > I no longer have the time/interest to proxy maintain this. > I wish to be removed from the metadata.xml. > > It has one open bug : > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bu

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs

2016-05-28 Thread Daniel Campbell (zlg)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On May 28, 2016 5:41:40 AM PDT, rindeal wrote: >On 28 May 2016 at 11:14, Pacho Ramos wrote: >> Markos is not having much time to handle his packages and, then, he >> would like to get other people involved in them. The idea is to keep >> him in met

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs

2016-05-28 Thread Pacho Ramos
El sáb, 28-05-2016 a las 14:41 +0200, rindeal escribió: > On 28 May 2016 at 11:14, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > > > Markos is not having much time to handle his packages and, then, he > > would like to get other people involved in them. The idea is to > > keep > > him in metadata as co-maintainer but,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs

2016-05-28 Thread rindeal
On 28 May 2016 at 11:14, Pacho Ramos wrote: > Markos is not having much time to handle his packages and, then, he > would like to get other people involved in them. The idea is to keep > him in metadata as co-maintainer but, please, don't hesitate to add > yourself if wanted: > app-admin/verynice

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs

2016-05-28 Thread Lars Wendler
On Sat, 28 May 2016 11:30:44 +0200 Pacho Ramos wrote: >Because of maintainer retiring the following packages are up for grabs: >app-admin/hwreport >app-admin/tmpwatch >app-misc/gramps >app-portage/g-ctan >net-misc/icaclient >virtual/pager > > I can take net-misc/icaclient as I need it for work.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs

2016-05-22 Thread rindeal
On 22 May 2016 at 21:52, Pacho Ramos wrote: > Because of the current maintainer retiring, > the following packages are now up for grabs: > app-admin/verynice > app-crypt/zuluCrypt > dev-cpp/luabind > dev-libs/angelscript > dev-libs/libntru > dev-libs/libuv > dev-lua/luvit > dev-python/pathtools >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs

2016-05-22 Thread Nils Gillmann
On 2016-05-22(09:52:02PM+0200), Pacho Ramos wrote: > Because of the current maintainer retiring, > the following packages are now up for grabs: > app-admin/verynice > app-crypt/zuluCrypt > dev-cpp/luabind > dev-libs/angelscript > dev-libs/libntru > dev-libs/libuv > dev-lua/luvit > dev-python/pathto

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs

2016-05-22 Thread James Le Cuirot
On Sun, 22 May 2016 21:52:02 +0200 Pacho Ramos wrote: > dev-libs/angelscript I'll take this if no one else wants it. I'm planning on joining the games team at some point and it's used by at least one game I was packaging way back. -- James Le Cuirot (chewi) Gentoo Linux Developer pgpbT4EbUEq

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs

2016-05-22 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 9:52 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > dev-python/pathtools > dev-python/pygame_sdl2 > dev-python/pyuv > dev-python/watchdog I think the Python team can take pathtools and watchdog. Not so sure about pyuv and pygame_sdl2, though. Cheesr, Dirkjan

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs

2016-05-21 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Sat, 21 May 2016, Pacho Ramos wrote: > Because of the current maintainer not having time to take care of > them, the following packages are now up for grabs: > app-editors/joe > dev-lang/ucblogo > www-apache/mod_limitipconn The Emacs team will take app-editors/joe unless someone else wan

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: dev-libs/fcgi

2013-05-15 Thread Rafael Goncalves Martins
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Rafael Goncalves Martins < rafaelmart...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Hans de Graaff wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I thought I already dropped maintainership of this package a long time >> ago, since I haven't been using fastcgi for ages, but a n

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: dev-libs/fcgi

2013-05-14 Thread Rafael Goncalves Martins
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Hans de Graaff wrote: > Hi, > > I thought I already dropped maintainership of this package a long time > ago, since I haven't been using fastcgi for ages, but a new bug today > told me I forgot. I've done so now. Someone please pick this up if you > still use fast

Re: [gentoo-dev] package up for grabs (almost everything in the livecd herd)

2009-12-31 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 8:25 PM, Andrew Gaffney wrote: > If you are interested in any of the below packages, feel free to steal it (and > change the maintainer and herd bit in the metadata.xml). > > dev-python/pyparted - Used by the now defunct GLI This has also not been updated since 2007 -- htt

Re: [gentoo-dev] package up for grabs (almost everything in the livecd herd)

2009-12-31 Thread Jeremy Olexa
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 17:11:57 +0100, justin wrote: > On 31/12/09 15:55, Andrew Gaffney wrote: >> app-admin/pwgen - This is used by the LiveCD to generate a "random" >> password. >>It looks like upstream hasn't touched this since it was last bumped >>in the >>tree. > > I would take thi

Re: [gentoo-dev] package up for grabs (almost everything in the livecd herd)

2009-12-31 Thread justin
On 31/12/09 15:55, Andrew Gaffney wrote: > app-admin/pwgen - This is used by the LiveCD to generate a "random" password. >It looks like upstream hasn't touched this since it was last bumped in the >tree. I would take this one. Jeremy, would you proxy me the next time? signature.asc Desc

Re: [gentoo-dev] package up for grabs (almost everything in the livecd herd)

2009-12-31 Thread Dror Levin
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 16:55, Andrew Gaffney wrote: > app-arch/pbzip2 - We pondered using it at some point to take advantage of > all > the shiny new multi-proc boxes that releng and its members had laying > around > I'll take pbzip2. -- Dror Levin

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs

2008-11-17 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 11:27 Mon 17 Nov , Doug Goldstein wrote: > dev-util/cvs2svn > > If anyone wants it, please have at it. I haven't used it in 2 years. This is the tool I've been using for git conversions, FWIW, so I'll maintain it as long as it's relevant there. -- Thanks, Donnie Donnie Berkholz Develop