On Thu, 3 Nov 2016 21:49:16 + Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 05:36:03PM -0400, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
> > On Thursday, November 3, 2016 9:14:56 AM EDT William Hubbs wrote:
> I have posted about this subject before, and I'll go and dust off the
> proposal with the last
On 11/03/2016 04:49 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 05:36:03PM -0400, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
>> On Thursday, November 3, 2016 9:14:56 AM EDT William Hubbs wrote:
> I have posted about this subject before, and I'll go and dust off the
> proposal with the last changes add
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 5:36 PM, William L. Thomson Jr.
wrote:
> On Thursday, November 3, 2016 9:14:56 AM EDT William Hubbs wrote:
>>
>> I am also in favor of the metadata approach.
>
> Also it may start inching things towards restricting areas of the tree to said
> members of teams etc. Which star
On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 05:36:03PM -0400, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
> On Thursday, November 3, 2016 9:14:56 AM EDT William Hubbs wrote:
I have posted about this subject before, and I'll go and dust off the
proposal with the last changes added, when I have time soon hopefully.
> > I am also in
On Thursday, November 3, 2016 9:14:56 AM EDT William Hubbs wrote:
>
> I am also in favor of the metadata approach.
The only downfall is you end up with lots of package/developer specific
policies which may become complex and a nuisance. It is likely better to have
more of a global policy.
Also
On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 09:54:39AM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> >
> >
> > Although metadata.xml is one way to do this, since it is more of a social
> > thing than a technical one I think it might be better to wikify it instead
> > -- each
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>
>
> Although metadata.xml is one way to do this, since it is more of a social
> thing than a technical one I think it might be better to wikify it instead --
> each dev can list their "please fix my package" preferences in a per package
> On Nov 3, 2016, at 8:21 AM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 1:15 PM, Nick Vinson wrote:
>> Just doing that one little thing would have prevented or shutdown the
>> arguments I have seen.
>
> Yes, obviously of course.
>
> But sometimes it's just easier and quicker to me
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 1:15 PM, Nick Vinson wrote:
> Just doing that one little thing would have prevented or shutdown the
> arguments I have seen.
Yes, obviously of course.
But sometimes it's just easier and quicker to meddle in somebody
else's ebuild to improve a particular situation. The ques
On 11/03/2016 03:16 AM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> Every other day on IRC, I see people arguing about touching each
> others packages, despite our policies against it. (Sometimes it's even
> me who's doing the touching!) My instinctive reaction is always,
> "can't everybody calm dow
10 matches
Mail list logo
