Heya,
Christina Fullam write:
> Most who have accepted havent told us why we should vote for them. While
> that information is not required perhaps it should be if we are to make
> intelligent votes - sorry this isnt a popularity contest so give us some
> content to review.
I put my little manife
> Those who have accepted though havent sent information regarding why we
> should vote for them:
Since it's almost time to vote, here's a collection of my thoughts
about the council:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~amne/stuff/councilnomination.txt
If something is unclear or you have further questions, fe
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 17:38:16 -0700
Christina Fullam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1) What you will do
> 2) Why you will do it
> 3) How you will do it
> 4) What is the timescale for doing it
> 5) What experience do you have with this or a similar role
> 6) Why do you think you are qualified
> 7) How
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 17:38:16 -0700
Christina Fullam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Although I've mentioned quite a bit, I feel that some of these
questions still need addressing... This lot can probably be added to
my candidate info stuffs/platform thingie on the site...
[..snip..]
> 1) What you will
Yesterday night I tried to reply but I was too tired...
Christina Fullam wrote:
> Just a reminder about nominations and voting...
> If anyone is still interested in running, you have one week left for
> nominations.
> Most who have accepted havent told us why we should vote for them. While
> that
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 14:25:56 +0200
"Wulf C. Krueger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've said my piece. You'll vote for me if you agree with my
> > technical decisions and you find yourself siding with me (even
> > mentally) in the few discussions I take part in on -dev and #-dev.
>
> I can't say
On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 14:25 +0200, Wulf C. Krueger wrote:
> I can't say much about your technical decisions because I haven't
> consciously seen any, I rarely see you take part in any discussions.
Maybe that's because -dev wasn't a forum for technical discussion.
Hopefully that might change.
>
Hello Roy!
I've said my piece. You'll vote for me if you agree with my technical
decisions and you find yourself siding with me (even mentally) in the
few discussions I take part in on -dev and #-dev.
I can't say much about your technical decisions because I haven't
consciously seen any, I r
On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 17:38 -0700, Christina Fullam wrote:
> Just a reminder about nominations and voting...
> If anyone is still interested in running, you have one week left for
> nominations.
> Most who have accepted havent told us why we should vote for them. While
> that information is not req
