> On Mon, 06 Jun 2016, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> First draft of news item for proceeding with LINGUAS USE_EXPAND rename
> to L10N independently of the INSTALL_MASK feature additions.
> I hope English natives will improve the sentence flow and grammar here
> :)
> Perhaps there's also a better tit
> On Mon, 13 Jun 2016, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> This was just my random set of thoughts, so Ulrich knows them while
> writing a new version of the news item tomorrow ;)
Yeah, sorry, but I haven't found the time yet. I was wondering though,
maybe we should have two news items? One now, announcin
Ühel kenal päeval, T, 07.06.2016 kell 20:28, kirjutas Michał Górny:
>
> So here's how I would word it. I think if we combine a few different
> texts, we may end up with something good ;-).
>
> ---
> The LINGUAS USE flag group has been renamed to L10N, in order to
> avoid
> a conceptual clash betw
Ulrich Mueller schrieb:
POSIX.1-2008[2] as you mentioned defines a slightly different format
for locales
language[_territory][.codeset]
Only LC_COLLATE, LC_CTYPE, LC_MESSAGES, LC_MONETARY, LC_NUMERIC, and
LC_TIME additionally accept specification of a modifier.
[language[_territory][.cod
On Mon, 06 Jun 2016 03:22:34 +0300
Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> First draft of news item for proceeding with LINGUAS USE_EXPAND rename
> to L10N independently of the INSTALL_MASK feature additions.
>
> I hope English natives will improve the sentence flow and grammar here
> :)
> Perhaps there's also a
> On Mon, 6 Jun 2016, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Jun 2016, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
>> I'm not totally convinced yet.
>> Following the BCP-47 spec the format is
>> Language-Tag = langtag ; normal language tags
>> langtag = language
>> ["-" script]
>> [
> On Mon, 6 Jun 2016, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
> I'm not totally convinced yet.
> Following the BCP-47 spec the format is
> Language-Tag = langtag ; normal language tags
> langtag = language
> ["-" script]
> ["-" region]
>
Ulrich Mueller schrieb:
On Mon, 6 Jun 2016, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
Ulrich Mueller schrieb:
Question related to this, do we take the opportunity to standardise
the values? Looks like the vast majority follows
language[_territory][@modifier] specified by POSIX [1] but some
don't.
Wh
> On Mon, 6 Jun 2016, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
> Ulrich Mueller schrieb:
>> Question related to this, do we take the opportunity to standardise
>> the values? Looks like the vast majority follows
>> language[_territory][@modifier] specified by POSIX [1] but some
>> don't.
> What do
Ulrich Mueller schrieb:
On Mon, 06 Jun 2016, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
Usually only two letter language codes suffice, but can be limited with
country codes with a 'll_CC' formatting, where 'll' is the language code
and 'CC' is the country code, e.g en_GB. Some rare languages also have
three letter
> On Mon, 06 Jun 2016, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> Usually only two letter language codes suffice, but can be limited with
> country codes with a 'll_CC' formatting, where 'll' is the language code
> and 'CC' is the country code, e.g en_GB. Some rare languages also have
> three letter language code
On Mon, 06 Jun 2016 03:22:34 +0300
Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> First draft of news item for proceeding with LINGUAS USE_EXPAND rename
> to L10N independently of the INSTALL_MASK feature additions.
>
> I hope English natives will improve the sentence flow and grammar here
> :)
> Perhaps there's also a
12 matches
Mail list logo
