On 03/04/10 10:35, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 10:32:47 +0100
> Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>>> On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
>>> My proposal would be to call it dev-scm and put all version
>>> controls, direct frontends, plugins and the like into that.
I like the
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 09:35:28 +
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> And this is why the move wasn't done five years ago: by the time we'd
> worked out everything we'd need to do by hand because epkgmove was
> broken, the whole thing got bikeshedded to death.
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56967
Ulrich Mueller dixit (2010-03-04, 10:32):
> > On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
>
> > My proposal would be to call it dev-scm and put all version
> > controls, direct frontends, plugins and the like into that.
>
> Better call it dev-vcs to avoid confusion with both the Scheme
>
On 4 March 2010 10:58, Alex Alexander wrote:
> Nice idea, +1.
>
> I too prefer dev-vcs as the category name.
My thoughts exactly.
Cheers,
--
Ben de Groot
Gentoo Linux developer (qt, media, lxde, desktop-misc)
__
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:28, Petteri Räty wrote:
> I would let the people maintaining the packages in the new category
> decide what to call it.
As the primary maintainer for mercurial, hgsubversion and hg-git, I
would prefer dev-vcs.
I wonder, would a Python re-implementation of git libraries
On 03/04/2010 11:35 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 10:32:47 +0100
> Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>>> On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
>>> My proposal would be to call it dev-scm and put all version
>>> controls, direct frontends, plugins and the like into that.
>>
>> B
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 10:32:47AM +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
>
> > My proposal would be to call it dev-scm and put all version
> > controls, direct frontends, plugins and the like into that.
>
> Better call it dev-vcs to avoid confusion w
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 10:32:47 +0100
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> > My proposal would be to call it dev-scm and put all version
> > controls, direct frontends, plugins and the like into that.
>
> Better call it dev-vcs to avoid confusion with both t
> On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> My proposal would be to call it dev-scm and put all version
> controls, direct frontends, plugins and the like into that.
Better call it dev-vcs to avoid confusion with both the Scheme
language and with software configuration management.
Ul
