On Fri, 23 Sep 2005, Patrick Kursawe wrote:
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 06:22:43PM +0200, Pawe? Madej wrote:
I've found a news that LSB Release3 [1] was announced. So there is my
question. Are Gentoo Foundation and Gentoo Developers developing Gentoo
Linux in coordinance with standards provided by
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| Nope. There's no interest in LSB compliance. LSB isn't a real standard,
| it's some nonsense dreamed up so that companies like Sun can claim that
| they are "Linux compliant" (meaning "behaves like RedHat").
Of course you'll
On Friday 23 September 2005 12:22 pm, Paweł Madej wrote:
> I've found a news that LSB Release3 [1] was announced. So there is my
> question. Are Gentoo Foundation and Gentoo Developers developing Gentoo
> Linux in coordinance with standards provided by this specification?
this has come up before o
On Fri, 23 Sep 2005 18:22:43 +0200 Paweł Madej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| I've found a news that LSB Release3 [1] was announced. So there is my
| question. Are Gentoo Foundation and Gentoo Developers developing
| Gentoo Linux in coordinance with standards provided by this
| specification?
Nope.
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 06:22:43PM +0200, Pawe? Madej wrote:
> I've found a news that LSB Release3 [1] was announced. So there is my
> question. Are Gentoo Foundation and Gentoo Developers developing Gentoo
> Linux in coordinance with standards provided by this specification?
>
> Could someone g
