On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:07 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> Wait, what? If you're not even in QA, then who are you to start
>> masking other people's packages?
>>
> It seems you don't even bother to read the masking message or my
> comments on the bug. I said "Talk to QA and CC me if you want to
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 10/11/11 08:21, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Markos Chandras
> wrote:
>> On 10/11/11 06:22, Matt Turner wrote:
>>> On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Markos Chandras
>>> wrote:
I am not in QA fwiw just trying t
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On 10/11/11 06:22, Matt Turner wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Markos Chandras
>> wrote:
>>> I am not in QA fwiw just trying to keep a basic QA level in
>>> portage tree.
>>
>> Wait, what? If you're not even in QA, then who are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 10/11/11 06:22, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Markos Chandras
> wrote:
>> I am not in QA fwiw just trying to keep a basic QA level in
>> portage tree.
>
> Wait, what? If you're not even in QA, then who are you to start
>
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> I am not in QA fwiw just trying to keep a basic QA level in portage tree.
Wait, what? If you're not even in QA, then who are you to start
masking other people's packages?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 10/09/11 16:15, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 5:18 AM, Markos Chandras
> wrote:
>> Watch your language. This is not your $home playroom
>
> And it's not your mailing list.
>
> I'm sure I'm not the only one that's tired of your Let
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 5:18 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> Watch your language. This is not your $home playroom
And it's not your mailing list.
I'm sure I'm not the only one that's tired of your Let Me Insert
Myself Into Everything syndrome just because you're on QA. QA's a joke
that's only used a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 10/09/11 02:47, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Markos Chandras
> wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512
>>
>> On 10/08/11 22:45, Matt Turner wrote:
>>> On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Markos Chandras
>>
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> 1) use bundled zlib and libpng14. Doh this is not a fix. It is barely
> a workaround. What if a vulnerability is discovered in the bundled
> version of libpng in the next months? Will upstream fix it? Highly
> unlikely since they don't seem
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 10/08/11 22:45, Matt Turner wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Markos Chandras
>> wrote:
>>> On 10/08/2011 02:19 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 4:47 AM, Sa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 10/08/11 22:45, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Markos Chandras
> wrote:
>> On 10/08/2011 02:19 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
>>> On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 4:47 AM, Samuli Suominen
>>> wrote:
# Samuli Suominen (08 Oct 2011) #
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On 10/08/2011 02:19 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 4:47 AM, Samuli Suominen
>> wrote:
>>> # Samuli Suominen (08 Oct 2011) # Fails to
>>> compile against system libpng15, bug 356127 # Removal in 14 days
>>
>> 14 days?
>>
On 08-10-2011 18:33:15 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> It's not like fastened lastriting hasn't happened before. I question
> your motives in picking this particular one. It's not like I expected
> cookies for the time I've put into this porting effort, but not this
> "attack" either.
If you feel
On 10/08/2011 06:13 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 08-10-2011 11:05:08 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> If the extra 16 days will actually accomplish something beyond just
>> delaying libpng then we can debate the finer points of policy.
>> However, if we're just arguing policy for its own sake then I
Guys,
the policy makes perfect sense, there are people that sync just
monthly, so they might want to get some headsup why their packages are
going away, and not just remove them.
Thats why the recommended value is 60 days, 30 for urgent cases,
lately we just moved to 30 for everything, but please
On 08-10-2011 11:05:08 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
> If the extra 16 days will actually accomplish something beyond just
> delaying libpng then we can debate the finer points of policy.
> However, if we're just arguing policy for its own sake then I don't
> see the value. Perhaps a package maintain
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On 10/08/2011 02:19 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
>> 14 days?
> We can't really wait forever for slacking maintainers to fix their
> packages. amd64 is almost ready to have libpng-1.5 stable in the very
> near future
>
Didn't we just do this thre
On 08-10-2011 15:49:00 +0100, Markos Chandras wrote:
> >> We can't really wait forever for slacking maintainers to fix
> >> their packages. amd64 is almost ready to have libpng-1.5 stable
> >> in the very near future
> >
> > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/handbook/handbook.xml?part=2&chap=5#
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 10/08/2011 03:28 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 08-10-2011 15:20:56 +0100, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512
>>
>> On 10/08/2011 02:19 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
>>> On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 4:47 AM, Samuli Suomi
On 08-10-2011 15:20:56 +0100, Markos Chandras wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 10/08/2011 02:19 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 4:47 AM, Samuli Suominen
> > wrote:
> >> # Samuli Suominen (08 Oct 2011) # Fails to
> >> compile against system libpn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 10/08/2011 02:19 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 4:47 AM, Samuli Suominen
> wrote:
>> # Samuli Suominen (08 Oct 2011) # Fails to
>> compile against system libpng15, bug 356127 # Removal in 14 days
>
> 14 days?
>
>> media-gfx/pn
On 10/08/2011 04:19 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 4:47 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> # Samuli Suominen (08 Oct 2011)
>> # Fails to compile against system libpng15, bug 356127
>> # Removal in 14 days
>
> 14 days?
approx. 14 days and counting to CC archteams in the libpng15
stab
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 4:47 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> # Samuli Suominen (08 Oct 2011)
> # Fails to compile against system libpng15, bug 356127
> # Removal in 14 days
14 days?
> media-gfx/pngcrush
23 matches
Mail list logo
