On Wed, 2024-01-10 at 16:20 +0200, Jaco Kroon wrote:
>
> >
>
> Tests are busy running now. Seem to be slow. Updated ebuild pushed
> to the PR. Will advise test outcome on the PR.
I'd be happy to help out with ruby-specific issues and dependencies.
>
> Someone will probably need/want to
Hi Sam,
On 2024/01/10 13:02, Sam James wrote:
Jaco Kroon writes:
How critical is it that they do?
Even for the bump PR they do not, they fail with the below, and
frankly my knowledge of ruby is outright scary. The below to me
indicates that the tests are designed specifically to run from a g
Jaco Kroon writes:
> Hi,
>
> On 2024/01/09 13:42, Michał Górny wrote:
>> On Tue, 2024-01-09 at 12:54 +0200, Jaco Kroon wrote:
>>> https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/34126 ??
>>>
>>> Perhaps I'm missing something if you say it's non-trivial but we're
>>> using that on 9 hosts currently.
>>>
>
Hi,
On 2024/01/09 13:42, Michał Górny wrote:
On Tue, 2024-01-09 at 12:54 +0200, Jaco Kroon wrote:
https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/34126 ??
Perhaps I'm missing something if you say it's non-trivial but we're
using that on 9 hosts currently.
Do tests pass for you? https://bugs.gentoo.or
On Tue, 2024-01-09 at 12:54 +0200, Jaco Kroon wrote:
> https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/34126 ??
>
> Perhaps I'm missing something if you say it's non-trivial but we're
> using that on 9 hosts currently.
>
Do tests pass for you? https://bugs.gentoo.org/879181#c2 indicated that
they do not
https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/34126 ??
Perhaps I'm missing something if you say it's non-trivial but we're
using that on 9 hosts currently.
On 2023/12/31 12:34, Michał Górny wrote:
# Michał Górny (2023-12-31)
# Unresolved vulnerability. The current version is from 2022-03,
# and th
