Re: [gentoo-dev] Last-rite: app-misc/neofetch

2023-10-21 Thread Jonas Stein
Hey, I was looking at these metrics: https://github.com/dylanaraps/neofetch/branches/active https://github.com/dylanaraps/neofetch/branches https://github.com/dylanaraps/neofetch/issues https://github.com/dylanaraps/neofetch/pulls and it's not looking good. Do we have the wrong upstream in our c

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last-rite: app-misc/neofetch

2023-10-20 Thread Andrew Ammerlaan
On 20/10/2023 14:39, Joonas Niilola wrote: On 20.10.2023 15.30, Pascal Jaeger wrote: This is only two years without a release. We have packages way way older than that. I know fetch scripts have a reputation, but this thing is kind of a staple in the community and it is still widely used. I ca

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last-rite: app-misc/neofetch

2023-10-20 Thread Joonas Niilola
On 20.10.2023 15.30, Pascal Jaeger wrote: > > This is only two years without a release. We have packages way way older > than that. > I know fetch scripts have a reputation, but this thing is kind > of a staple in the community and it is still widely used. > > I can jump in as a proxy maintainer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last-rite: app-misc/neofetch

2023-10-20 Thread Pascal Jaeger
This is only two years without a release. We have packages way way older than that. I know fetch scripts have a reputation, but this thing is kind of a staple in the community and it is still widely used. I can jump in as a proxy maintainer if that is the problem. Pascal Joonas Niilola writes