Can a single project have multiple super-projects? If so, herds might
become redundant.
On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 7:32 PM, Raymond Jennings
> wrote:
> > Is it possible for projects to be nested, possibly within multiple
> > super-projects?
>
On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 7:32 PM, Raymond Jennings wrote:
> Is it possible for projects to be nested, possibly within multiple
> super-projects?
>
> Like, for example, a project dealing with a gnome chat client itself being
> members of both the gnome and the chat projects (hypothetically speaking)
Is it possible for projects to be nested, possibly within multiple
super-projects?
Like, for example, a project dealing with a gnome chat client itself being
members of both the gnome and the chat projects (hypothetically speaking)?
Maybe allow projects themselves to be members of other projects
On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
> +1 in general, but I'm a little pensive about allowing non-devs to
> become official project members. Becoming a developer can be a
> grueling process, so I understand that some don't have the time or
> motivation, and still want to help ou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 09/17/2015 12:40 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 2015-09-16, o godz. 23:25:33 Michał Górny
> napisał(a):
>
>> So, what are your thoughts for unmessing this?
>
> For completeness, a semi-conservative idea that could be
> implemented relatively ea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 09/18/2015 03:16 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> Am Freitag, 18. September 2015, 06:49:07 schrieb Robin H. Johnson:
>> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 11:43:02PM +0200, Andreas K. Huettel
>> wrote:
>
>>> a) Disallow the term "herd". Noone uses it correc
Dnia 19 września 2015 00:30:02 CEST, "Andreas K. Huettel"
napisał(a):
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA512
>
>Am Freitag, 18. September 2015, 07:10:56 schrieb Michał Górny:
>>
>> 1. You can't list developers who are not subscribed on the wiki.
>
>- -EDEVELOPER, or PEBKAC
>
>I suspe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am Freitag, 18. September 2015, 07:10:56 schrieb Michał Górny:
>
> 1. You can't list developers who are not subscribed on the wiki.
- -EDEVELOPER, or PEBKAC
I suspect this problem will go away very quickly once the aliases are
generated from the w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am Freitag, 18. September 2015, 06:49:07 schrieb Robin H. Johnson:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 11:43:02PM +0200, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>
> > a) Disallow the term "herd". Noone uses it correctly anyway.
> >
> > b) package is "in herd" -> package is
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 1:10 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 2015-09-17, o godz. 17:19:17
> Michael Orlitzky napisał(a):
>
>> Replying somewhere randomly with an idea.
>>
>> Since projects are now on the wiki, why don't we use that as the
>> canonical source of project members? It's machine readab
Dnia 2015-09-17, o godz. 17:19:17
Michael Orlitzky napisał(a):
> Replying somewhere randomly with an idea.
>
> Since projects are now on the wiki, why don't we use that as the
> canonical source of project members? It's machine readable, although not
> so nice to have it located outside the repo
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 11:43:02PM +0200, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> a) Disallow the term "herd". Noone uses it correctly anyway.
>
> b) package is "in herd" -> package is "maintained by project"
>
> b') in metadata.xml x -> y
+1 on each.
> b'') simple and stupid mapping project y -> alias y-
Replying somewhere randomly with an idea.
Since projects are now on the wiki, why don't we use that as the
canonical source of project members? It's machine readable, although not
so nice to have it located outside the repo/ldap.
The email alias would then be auto-generated from the project membe
On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 21:02:02 +0100
Markos Chandras wrote:
> On 09/17/2015 12:05 PM, James Le Cuirot wrote:
> > On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 06:57:08 -0400
> > "Anthony G. Basile" wrote:
> >
> >> Totally rethink the idea of emails aliases as something that is
> >> created on the fly. We just need to kno
On 09/17/2015 12:05 PM, James Le Cuirot wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 06:57:08 -0400
> "Anthony G. Basile" wrote:
>
>> Totally rethink the idea of emails aliases as something that is
>> created on the fly. We just need to know who should get emails for a
>> package when it comes to bug reports.
Dnia 2015-09-16, o godz. 23:25:33
Michał Górny napisał(a):
> So, what are your thoughts for unmessing this?
For completeness, a semi-conservative idea that could be implemented
relatively easily.
1. Stop caring about names. If people want to call it a project, let it
be a project. If people wan
Dnia 17 września 2015 12:57:08 CEST, "Anthony G. Basile"
napisał(a):
>On 9/17/15 6:32 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
>>
>> Dnia 17 września 2015 11:07:43 CEST, "Anthony G. Basile"
> napisał(a):
>>> On 9/17/15 4:35 AM, Justin (jlec) wrote:
On 16/09/15 23:43, Matthew Thode wrote:
> On 09/16/201
On Thu, 2015-09-17 at 07:20 -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> On 9/17/15 7:05 AM, James Le Cuirot wrote:
> > On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 06:57:08 -0400
> > "Anthony G. Basile" wrote:
> >
> > > Totally rethink the idea of emails aliases as something that is
> > > created on the fly. We just need to know
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> On 9/17/15 7:05 AM, James Le Cuirot wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 06:57:08 -0400
>> "Anthony G. Basile" wrote:
>>
>>> Totally rethink the idea of emails aliases as something that is
>>> created on the fly. We just need to know who sh
On 9/17/15 7:05 AM, James Le Cuirot wrote:
On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 06:57:08 -0400
"Anthony G. Basile" wrote:
Totally rethink the idea of emails aliases as something that is
created on the fly. We just need to know who should get emails for a
package when it comes to bug reports. Why can't that b
On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 06:57:08 -0400
"Anthony G. Basile" wrote:
> Totally rethink the idea of emails aliases as something that is
> created on the fly. We just need to know who should get emails for a
> package when it comes to bug reports. Why can't that be calculated
> on the fly from the metad
On 9/17/15 6:32 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 17 września 2015 11:07:43 CEST, "Anthony G. Basile"
napisał(a):
On 9/17/15 4:35 AM, Justin (jlec) wrote:
On 16/09/15 23:43, Matthew Thode wrote:
On 09/16/2015 04:25 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
So, what are your thoughts for unmessing this?
Herds a
Dnia 16 września 2015 23:51:20 CEST, "Andreas K. Huettel"
napisał(a):
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA512
>
>Am Mittwoch, 16. September 2015, 23:43:43 schrieb Matthew Thode:
>
>>
>> Herds are groups of developers that can then be mapped to a package.
>>
>
>Heh. See? :)
Could yo
Dnia 17 września 2015 11:07:43 CEST, "Anthony G. Basile"
napisał(a):
>On 9/17/15 4:35 AM, Justin (jlec) wrote:
>> On 16/09/15 23:43, Matthew Thode wrote:
>>> On 09/16/2015 04:25 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
So, what are your thoughts for unmessing this?
>>> Herds are groups of develop
On 9/17/15 4:35 AM, Justin (jlec) wrote:
On 16/09/15 23:43, Matthew Thode wrote:
On 09/16/2015 04:25 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
So, what are your thoughts for unmessing this?
Herds are groups of developers that can then be mapped to a package.
Herds are a group of packages, which are maintain
On 16/09/15 23:43, Matthew Thode wrote:
> On 09/16/2015 04:25 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Right now we kinda have three layers of team package maintainership
>> in Gentoo:
>>
>> 1. e-mail aliases + bugzilla accounts,
>>
>> 2. herds,
>>
>> 3. projects.
>>
>> Now if we get into the detail
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 5:25 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> So, what are your thoughts for unmessing this?
>
This sounds familiar. :)
Honestly, I wouldn't mind combining them all. Just today I was pinged
by an !expn in IRC and thought to myself, "how many times have I typed
the wrong command to t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am Mittwoch, 16. September 2015, 23:43:43 schrieb Matthew Thode:
>
> Herds are groups of developers that can then be mapped to a package.
>
Heh. See? :)
- --
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer
dilfri...@gentoo.org
http://www.akhuettel.
On 09/16/2015 04:25 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Right now we kinda have three layers of team package maintainership
> in Gentoo:
>
> 1. e-mail aliases + bugzilla accounts,
>
> 2. herds,
>
> 3. projects.
>
> Now if we get into the details, it's all very messy.
>
>
> E-mail aliases ar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am Mittwoch, 16. September 2015, 23:25:33 schrieb Michał Górny:
>
> To summarize, I see the following issues:
>
> 1. All three layers are totally disjoint, stored in completely
> different format in completely different places.
>
> 2. Only herds a
30 matches
Mail list logo
