On Sat, 17 Jun 2017 14:43:24 +0300
Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jun 2017 19:52:07 -0500 Matthias Maier wrote:
> > > there should be a way of turning these off systematically. the
> > > advantage of the current hardened gcc specs is that one can switch
> > > between them using gcc-config.
On Thu, 15 Jun 2017 19:52:07 -0500 Matthias Maier wrote:
> > there should be a way of turning these off systematically. the
> > advantage of the current hardened gcc specs is that one can switch
> > between them using gcc-config. if these are forced on for the default
> > profile then there will
> there should be a way of turning these off systematically. the
> advantage of the current hardened gcc specs is that one can switch
> between them using gcc-config. if these are forced on for the default
> profile then there will be no easy way to systematically turn them off.
No - there won't
On 6/15/17 11:20 AM, Matthias Maier wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Sun, Jun 11, 2017, at 16:39 CDT, Michael Brinkman
> wrote:
>
>> So I was just wondering if ~arch is ready for more secure defaults on
>> the 17.0 profiles in the linker flags. There are several
>> distributions which ship RELRO by
Hi Michael,
On Sun, Jun 11, 2017, at 16:39 CDT, Michael Brinkman
wrote:
> So I was just wondering if ~arch is ready for more secure defaults on
> the 17.0 profiles in the linker flags. There are several
> distributions which ship RELRO by default and I am not aware of any
> performance issues
Hi Michael
Am 11.06.2017 um 23:39 schrieb Michael Brinkman:
> Hello, so I've been running Gentoo Hardened for a few years on my
> laptop, my desktop, and a server made from an older desktop.
>
> Because of Grsecurity closing access to its source to non-subscribers,
> I decided that I would just
