Diamond wrote:
> we probably can arrive at a conclusion that git itself isn't good
> at all for package management.
I don't think we can. Please stop the nonsense, at least until you
have created something superior to git.
//Peter
On 19 September 2014 10:13, Diamond wrote:
> P.S. As you see from description this option affects git performance.
> So, we probably can arrive at a conclusion that git itself isn't good
> at all for package management. Maybe there are better architectural
> decisions for that.
>
Well. Yes. You'
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 14:29:41 -0700
"W. Trevor King" wrote:
>
> So Git works great, and GitHub's web UI doesn't support all of Git's
> bells and whistles, so… switch to a different VCS? Personally, my
> conclusion is “just use Git from the command line”. It's not like
> you're abandoning long
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 01:01:13AM +0400, Diamond wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 13:08:11 -0700 W. Trevor King wrote:
> > Git can check for copies if you like:
> >
> > $ git clone git://github.com/cerebrum/dr.git
> > $ cd dr/
> > $ git show --find-copies-harder 311df9b04
> > …
> > copy fro
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 13:08:11 -0700
"W. Trevor King" wrote:
> Git can check for copies if you like:
>
> $ git clone git://github.com/cerebrum/dr.git
> $ cd dr/
> $ git show --find-copies-harder 311df9b04
> …
> copy from games-strategy/openra/openra-20140608.ebuild
> copy to games-stra
