On 19-04-30 13:43:31, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 1:22 PM Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> >
> > It matters if things are perceived as official Gentoo and causing a
> > negative reputation as in the article in this thread. One some level
> > that actually goes to trademark infringe
On 19-04-30 17:36:46, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 07:24:45PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Tue, 2019-04-30 at 19:20 +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> > > On 4/30/19 7:18 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2019-04-29 at 22:34 +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> > > > >
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 1:22 PM Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>
> It matters if things are perceived as official Gentoo and causing a
> negative reputation as in the article in this thread. One some level
> that actually goes to trademark infringement that should be of interest
> to the foundation,
On 4/30/19 7:32 PM, Matthew Thode wrote:
> One thing that may help is to have multiple levels of control defined.
Indeed, this distinction is interesting.
--
Kristian Fiskerstrand
OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 07:24:45PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-04-30 at 19:20 +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> > On 4/30/19 7:18 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2019-04-29 at 22:34 +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> > > > In this article on chat services used for OSS:
> > > >
On 4/30/19 7:24 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>>> I've contacted the author and the author refused to change it.
>>> The claim is that 'PR team runs it', '8 Gentoo developers have admin
>>> rights', 'i.e. it is sanctioned by the project itself'. I was suggested
>>> that if it's not official, we should c
On 19-04-30 19:24:45, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-04-30 at 19:20 +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> > On 4/30/19 7:18 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2019-04-29 at 22:34 +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> > > > In this article on chat services used for OSS:
> > > >
> > > > https://cat
On Tue, 2019-04-30 at 19:20 +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> On 4/30/19 7:18 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Mon, 2019-04-29 at 22:34 +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> > > In this article on chat services used for OSS:
> > >
> > > https://catfox.life/2019/04/28/keeping-libre-software-accessible-
On 4/30/19 7:17 PM, Alec Warner wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 4:34 PM Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
>
>> In this article on chat services used for OSS:
>>
>> https://catfox.life/2019/04/28/keeping-libre-software-accessible-to-all/
>>
>> I was surprised to see a mention of Gentoo as a project that use
On 4/30/19 7:18 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-04-29 at 22:34 +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
>> In this article on chat services used for OSS:
>>
>> https://catfox.life/2019/04/28/keeping-libre-software-accessible-to-all/
>>
>> I was surprised to see a mention of Gentoo as a project that use
On Mon, 2019-04-29 at 22:34 +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> In this article on chat services used for OSS:
>
> https://catfox.life/2019/04/28/keeping-libre-software-accessible-to-all/
>
> I was surprised to see a mention of Gentoo as a project that uses "Discord
> as an official method of communi
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 4:34 PM Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> In this article on chat services used for OSS:
>
> https://catfox.life/2019/04/28/keeping-libre-software-accessible-to-all/
>
> I was surprised to see a mention of Gentoo as a project that uses "Discord
> as an official method of communicat
On 4/30/19 6:55 PM, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> Probably what it is - social media under PR admin. Do you
> consider facebook as official communication medium too?
No, Facebook is definitely not an official communication medium. However
you might argue that a given Facebook Page is official if it is
c
Ühel kenal päeval, T, 30.04.2019 kell 18:17, kirjutas Kristian
Fiskerstrand:
> On 4/30/19 6:04 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> > On 4/30/19 9:05 AM, Cynede wrote:
> > > Right, alike reddit, twitter, facebook and other PR channels.
> > > It's
> > > "official" because it's controlled by PR Gentoo
On 4/30/19 6:04 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> On 4/30/19 9:05 AM, Cynede wrote:
>> Right, alike reddit, twitter, facebook and other PR channels. It's
>> "official" because it's controlled by PR Gentoo team,
>
> No, that does not make anything official. Official would mean a place we
> would p
On 4/30/19 9:05 AM, Cynede wrote:
> Right, alike reddit, twitter, facebook and other PR channels. It's
> "official" because it's controlled by PR Gentoo team,
No, that does not make anything official. Official would mean a place we
would place an announcement ourselves and mostly comes down to our
On Mon, 2019-04-29 at 23:23 -0400, desultory wrote:
> On 04/29/19 17:04, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 4:34 PM Dirkjan Ochtman
> > wrote:
> > > In this article on chat services used for OSS:
> > >
> > > https://catfox.life/2019/04/28/keeping-libre-software-accessible-to-all/
> >
On Mon, 2019-04-29 at 22:34 +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> In this article on chat services used for OSS:
>
> https://catfox.life/2019/04/28/keeping-libre-software-accessible-to-all/
>
> I was surprised to see a mention of Gentoo as a project that uses "Discord
> as an official method of communi
On 04/29/19 17:04, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 4:34 PM Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
>>
>> In this article on chat services used for OSS:
>>
>> https://catfox.life/2019/04/28/keeping-libre-software-accessible-to-all/
>>
>> I was surprised to see a mention of Gentoo as a project that use
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 4:34 PM Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
>
> In this article on chat services used for OSS:
>
> https://catfox.life/2019/04/28/keeping-libre-software-accessible-to-all/
>
> I was surprised to see a mention of Gentoo as a project that uses "Discord as
> an official method of communic
20 matches
Mail list logo
