On Tuesday 22 August 2006 02:06, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Bringing up something I proposed previously... How about having teams
> that are considered 'important' (not a fixed list; this can vary
> depending upon what's going on) or 'to be having issues' deliver status
> reports to the council for t
Simon Stelling wrote:
> Lance Albertson wrote:
>> I generally try to do that, but after the 10th time the person doesn't
>> respect you and demands things from you, its kind of hard to keep that
>> mentality.
>
> Well, one out of >300. Simply do it for someone else then ;)
>
And that's what I do
Lance Albertson wrote:
> I generally try to do that, but after the 10th time the person doesn't
> respect you and demands things from you, its kind of hard to keep that
> mentality.
Well, one out of >300. Simply do it for someone else then ;)
--
Kind Regards,
Simon Stelling
Gentoo/AMD64 Develop
On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 14:45:45 + Elfyn McBratney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 03:40:31PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| > On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 16:33:17 +0200 Simon Stelling
| > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > | Respect is something that should be applied unconditionally,
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 03:40:31PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 16:33:17 +0200 Simon Stelling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | Respect is something that should be applied unconditionally, in my
> | opinion. The "you don't so I won't" attitude gets us nowhere.
>
> But i
Simon Stelling wrote:
> Lance Albertson wrote:
>> Frankly, the attitude of a lot devs lately towards infra
>> have made many of us not want to communicate what we're doing. If we're
>
> I can understand that, partly. But that won't help anyone. Assuming
> you're not thinking *nobody* outside infra
On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 16:33:17 +0200 Simon Stelling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| Respect is something that should be applied unconditionally, in my
| opinion. The "you don't so I won't" attitude gets us nowhere.
But if respect is unearned and undeserved, it's meaningless. What's the
point of being r
Lance Albertson wrote:
> Frankly, the attitude of a lot devs lately towards infra
> have made many of us not want to communicate what we're doing. If we're
I can understand that, partly. But that won't help anyone. Assuming
you're not thinking *nobody* outside infra does respect you, try to
write
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 18:56:11 -0400 Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | I request that these teams present status reports bi-weekly (thats one
> | every two weeks). You don't even have to write the reports, I will
> | volunteer to bug you every two weeks about what
Marius Mauch wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 18:56:11 -0400
> Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> It has been noted that certain projects do not communicate their
>> activities well.
>>
>> Many projects provide documentation for things(java), provide status
>> updates on things(ppc), have bit
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 18:56:11 -0400
Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It has been noted that certain projects do not communicate their
> activities well.
>
> Many projects provide documentation for things(java), provide status
> updates on things(ppc), have bits in the gwn (x86,userrel,amd6
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 20:21:15 -0400 Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| The problem with them delivering is that many would probably just not
| show up.
Hence why I said 'to the council for their monthly meeting', not 'at
the council's monthly meeting'.
--
Ciaran McCreesh
Mail: c
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 18:56:11 -0400 Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | I request that these teams present status reports bi-weekly (thats one
> | every two weeks). You don't even have to write the reports, I will
> | volunteer to bug you every two weeks about what
Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 18:56:11 -0400
> Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> [...] So below we have 3 large far-reaching projects.
>>
>> Gentoo Quality Assurance Team
>> Gentoo Infrastructure Team
>> Gentoo Portage Team
>> Gentoo Foundation
>> Gentoo Council
>>
>> All 5
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Seemant Kulleen wrote:
> Your concerns are well noted. The trustees in general are quiet even
> amongst themselves, but I hope this changes with the new board coming in
> next week (ish?). It's been my idea to propose that someone (tsunam was
> in my
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 18:56:11 -0400 Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| I request that these teams present status reports bi-weekly (thats one
| every two weeks). You don't even have to write the reports, I will
| volunteer to bug you every two weeks about what is going on in your
| project an
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 18:56:11 -0400
Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...] So below we have 3 large far-reaching projects.
>
> Gentoo Quality Assurance Team
> Gentoo Infrastructure Team
> Gentoo Portage Team
> Gentoo Foundation
> Gentoo Council
>
> All 5 of these projects are active
it's
Your concerns are well noted. The trustees in general are quiet even
amongst themselves, but I hope this changes with the new board coming in
next week (ish?). It's been my idea to propose that someone (tsunam was
in my head) publish a trustee monthly news or something.
The one I'm curious about
18 matches
Mail list logo
