Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Ok, new draft. Changes are as follows:
...
* Added emerge --ask thingie
Perhaps it would be a good idea to have an extra prompt during -av and a
forced prompt (perhaps with a timeout) for just plain old emerge. And to
make people that just don't care happy, a FEAT
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 21:13:29 +0100 Henrik Brix Andersen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 08:03:29PM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| > I'll accept that change if you get Grant to accept a mini-GLEP
| > switching the GLEPs over to use that format too.
|
| Fair enough. What do you
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 08:03:29PM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> I'll accept that change if you get Grant to accept a mini-GLEP
> switching the GLEPs over to use that format too.
Fair enough. What do you mean by a mini-GLEP?
Grant, what are your thoughts on this? Would you be willing to accept
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 20:55:23 +0100 Henrik Brix Andersen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 03:20:43AM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| > ``Posted:``
| > Date of posting, in ``dd-mmm-`` format (e.g. 14-Aug-2001)
| > for compatibility with GLEP 1 [#glep-1]_. UTC time in ``hh-
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 03:20:43AM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> ``Posted:``
> Date of posting, in ``dd-mmm-`` format (e.g. 14-Aug-2001) for
> compatibility with GLEP 1 [#glep-1]_. UTC time in ``hh-mm-ss +``
> format
> may also be included. Mandatory.
Proposed change:
``Po
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 23:25:29 -0500 Andrew Muraco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| >Ok, new draft. Changes are as follows:
| >
| I Think That You've tweaked this GLEP to death ;-)
Sadly not. It still needs work. It's going to take at least a couple
more drafts before I'd be hap
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Ok, new draft. Changes are as follows:
I Think That You've tweaked this GLEP to death ;-)
Anyways, I can't wait until everybody is happy with it and it gets
moving, because I know that gcc 4 and qt4 and glibc 2.3.6 are right
around the corner, and those would be great
