On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 7:35 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 09:25:45AM +0200, Petteri Räty wrote:
>> Doug Goldstein wrote:
>> > GLEP 27 [1] seems pretty stagnant and I'm planning on giving it a bit
>> > of a refresh and actually implementing it. Now before I do this I'm
>> >
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 09:25:45AM +0200, Petteri Räty wrote:
> Doug Goldstein wrote:
> > GLEP 27 [1] seems pretty stagnant and I'm planning on giving it a bit
> > of a refresh and actually implementing it. Now before I do this I'm
> > not in love with the format in tree but I haven't decided on a
Doug Goldstein wrote:
> GLEP 27 [1] seems pretty stagnant and I'm planning on giving it a bit
> of a refresh and actually implementing it. Now before I do this I'm
> not in love with the format in tree but I haven't decided on a format
> exactly in my head. So that being said, I'm sending this out
Mike Kelly wrote:
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 16:35:36 -0400
Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How does everyone feel about the proposed layout and syntaxes of GLEP
27?
Do we want to revisit this GLEP with an updated GLEP or status quo?
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0027.html
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 16:35:36 -0400
Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How does everyone feel about the proposed layout and syntaxes of GLEP
> 27?
>
> Do we want to revisit this GLEP with an updated GLEP or status quo?
>
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0027.html
This was my So
> My specific interest in it is for having a sane UID/GIDs that are
> identical between a set of machines, regardless of the order packages
> are emerged in.
I was initially surprised to see Gentoo didn't have written standards
for UID/GID management, but don't see many other distros having one
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
My specific interest in it is for having a sane UID/GIDs that are
identical between a set of machines, regardless of the order packages
are emerged in.
Same here. Which is why I'm hoping to revitalize GLEP 27.
--
Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://dev.gentoo.or
On 10-04-2008 16:35:36 -0400, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> How does everyone feel about the proposed layout and syntaxes of GLEP 27?
>
> Do we want to revisit this GLEP with an updated GLEP or status quo?
>
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0027.html
See also:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cg
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 04:35:36PM -0400, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> How does everyone feel about the proposed layout and syntaxes of GLEP 27?
> Do we want to revisit this GLEP with an updated GLEP or status quo?
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0027.html
I'm strongly in favour of moving forw
On Tue, 3 Oct 2006 13:46:03 -0400
Mike Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 08:09:08 -0400
> Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > You missed games-* (yes, all of them) via the games.eclass, but I'm
> > sure there's a couple more eclasses that do user/group modificat
On Tue, 3 Oct 2006 00:44:57 -0400
Mike Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 21:28:21 -0700
> Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'd prefer that the format be key=value for easier use by bash, as
> > pretty much everything else in profiles is bash.
>
> Only issue I
On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 10:20:53 +0200
Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> beside the syntax, as pointed by Donnie, it looks ok.
> I guess could be possible extract automagically from the current tree
> the data and create the datafile from it, isn't it?
Yeah, it should be. I'm writing up a few
On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 08:09:08 -0400
Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have a list of all packages in the tree that currently use either
> > of those functions[2]. If you maintain one of these packages, I'd
> > especially appreciate your feedback.
>
> You missed games-* (yes, all of
On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 22:58 -0400, Mike Kelly wrote:
> I have a list of all packages in the tree that currently use either of
> those functions[2]. If you maintain one of these packages, I'd
> especially appreciate your feedback.
You missed games-* (yes, all of them) via the games.eclass, but I'm
On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 21:28:21 -0700
Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mike Kelly wrote:
> > All the files are handled like other files in cascading profiles.
> > Each line in the file is either a shell-style comment, or of the
> > form: "key: value". The keys are: uid, shell, home, grou
On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 00:09:11 -0400
Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mike Kelly wrote:
> > Summarized, the format is:
> >
> > For each profile dir (e.g. profiles/base, profiles/default-linux,
> > etc), a new subdirectory, called accounts is created as necessary.
> > Inside that is a file
Mike Kelly wrote:
> All the files are handled like other files in cascading profiles. Each
> line in the file is either a shell-style comment, or of the form:
> "key: value". The keys are: uid, shell, home, groups, comment, and gid.
I'd prefer that the format be key=value for easier use by bash
Mike Kelly wrote:
Summarized, the format is:
For each profile dir (e.g. profiles/base, profiles/default-linux, etc),
a new subdirectory, called accounts is created as necessary. Inside
that is a file called defaults, containing default uid/gid ranges,
shells, etc for the given profile. Also,
On Monday 29 May 2006 23:29, Mike Kelly wrote:
> In particular, I know that at one point there was a push for the user
> info files to be XML
not really, it was just an idea i had at the time ... ive been over it a few
times since with the portage guys and it makes no real sense to do it in xml
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 09:14:01AM +0200, Danny van Dyk wrote:
> Hello Mike,
>
> Am Dienstag, 30. Mai 2006 05:29 schrieb Mike Kelly:
> > I'm Mike Kelly, one of the SoC-ers. I'll be working on GLEP 27 for
> > the summer. Right now I'm looking for some basic feedback on my
> > proposal.
> >
> > In p
Hello Mike,
Am Dienstag, 30. Mai 2006 05:29 schrieb Mike Kelly:
> I'm Mike Kelly, one of the SoC-ers. I'll be working on GLEP 27 for
> the summer. Right now I'm looking for some basic feedback on my
> proposal.
>
> In particular, I know that at one point there was a push for the user
> info files
21 matches
Mail list logo
