Re: [gentoo-dev] Future of tetex

2006-05-27 Thread Alexandre Buisse
On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 11:03:36 +0200, Marcus D. Hanwell wrote: > > > > Now for the exciting (but time consuming) news: > > > > The road to a stable TeXLive in Gentoo: > > > > 1. Stabilize tetex-3.0_p1[3]. We are almost done, there are very few > > real bugs left, and tetex-3.0_p1 is already mu

Re: [gentoo-dev] Future of tetex

2006-05-26 Thread Marcus D. Hanwell
Martin Ehmsen wrote: > This is sad because teTeX always has been a very stable (if you consider > the mess a TeX distribution normally is). There is a reason why teTeX > has been the default TeX distribution on almost every flavor of Linux. > > But it also means that we (Gentoo) should make the tr

Re: [gentoo-dev] Future of tetex

2006-05-26 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
On Friday 26 May 2006 13:02, Martin Ehmsen wrote: > We are currently considering using the same approach as with the > perl packages (using new-style virtuals), but I guess thats on hold until > it is okay to introduce additional new-style virtuals? As long as the name does not clash with the name