On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò
wrote:
>
> And I suggest we stop here. We have a different mailing list for this
> and it's getting tiring.
Ok, looking at the archives as far as I can tell nobody is really
monitoring that list (a post requesting a status update went
unanswered
On 01/10/2012 13:17, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Gregory M. Turner wrote:
>> > "fuck everyone, we are doing this, here is the changeover date."
> Well put. When is the date? I suggest October 5th, 18:00 UTC.
And I suggest we stop here. We have a different mailing list for this
and it's getting tiring.
-
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 7:29 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> Why exactly are we still using cvs? Rather than building enhancements
>> for cvs, why not just migrate everything to git, and spend our time
>> building the git hooks/etc necessary to
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 7:29 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> Why exactly are we still using cvs? Rather than building enhancements
> for cvs, why not just migrate everything to git, and spend our time
> building the git hooks/etc necessary to make this work?
The CIA/irc bot issue is pretty much entirel
Gregory M. Turner wrote:
> "fuck everyone, we are doing this, here is the changeover date."
Well put. When is the date? I suggest October 5th, 18:00 UTC.
//Peter
On 10/1/2012 10:29 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
Looking at the tracker [1], we need a pre-upload hook (I'm not quite
sure why), an rsync conversion script, the ability to validate the
converted tree, and documentation. There is still an open bug for
commit signing, and I'm not quite sure why as thi
Rich Freeman wrote:
> I doubt everybody is going to be happy if somebody convinces infra
> to shut down cvs without any discussion first.
I would do exactly that, actually.
There's been years of discussion. There's even a mailing list for
discussion.
//Peter
On 01/10/2012 11:29, Rich Freeman wrote:
> Where else would one discuss it?
gentoo-scm
Yes, there is a mailing list for that.
--
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Rafael Goncalves Martins
wrote:
> Have you ever thought that people may be not really interested on this
> move? or don't have the time to work on it? or don't care enough to
> spend time on it? or just wants someone else to do the work?
>
I'd thought of every sing
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
>> I don't know to what depth this has been discussed in the past, but if
>> you use git, you also get an HTTP transport, which has a useful
>> feature: You could simplify updating the tree on
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Rafael Goncalves Martins
> wrote:
>> Maybe someone with good cvs knowledge can contribute a hook for irker
>> [1], so we can have #gentoo-commits flooding our irc clients again! :)
>
> Why exactly are we still
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
> I don't know to what depth this has been discussed in the past, but if
> you use git, you also get an HTTP transport, which has a useful
> feature: You could simplify updating the tree on end-users's machines
> by using caching proxy servers (op
Well nenolod has written a CIA -> Irker proxy that (I believe) takes
commit messages designed to go to CIA and makes irker read them and
such, but i haven't looked into it:
https://github.com/nenolod/irker-cia-proxy
On 1 October 2012 11:21, Rafael Goncalves Martins
wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> On Mon, O
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Rafael Goncalves Martins
> wrote:
>> Maybe someone with good cvs knowledge can contribute a hook for irker
>> [1], so we can have #gentoo-commits flooding our irc clients again! :)
>
> Why exactly are we still
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Rafael Goncalves Martins
wrote:
> Maybe someone with good cvs knowledge can contribute a hook for irker
> [1], so we can have #gentoo-commits flooding our irc clients again! :)
Why exactly are we still using cvs? Rather than building enhancements
for cvs, why not
Hi Ben,
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 5:14 AM, Ben de Groot wrote:
> Since CIA.vc is dead [1], I think we should be looking into a
> replacement service, or host our own [2].
> Is infra already looking into this?
>
> 1: http://shadowm.rewound.net/blog/archives/245-CIA.vc-is-dead.html
> 2: http://www.don
Ben de Groot schrieb:
> Since CIA.vc is dead [1], I think we should be looking into a
> replacement service, or host our own [2].
I understand that ohloh is already tracking us (sometimes at least).
http://www.ohloh.net/p/gentoo/
Best regards,
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
17 matches
Mail list logo
