> On Wed, 10 Aug 2016, NP-Hardass wrote:
> I was going through my packages to make sure that I was compliant with
> this change, and found that I was not. The l10n eclass makes use of the
> LINGUAS USE_EXPAND and isn't covered in the tracker bug. I attempted to
> read through the old thread
On 11 August 2016 at 04:22, NP-Hardass wrote:
> Looks to me like we can't edit that eclass in place, so if we are to
> keep it, we should probably revbump it, update the -r1 to L10N, and add
> a deprecation warning to the old eclass to help maintainers migrate over.
>
> Any opinions? I'd be happy
On Wed, 10 Aug 2016 16:22:24 -0400
NP-Hardass wrote:
> I was going through my packages to make sure that I was compliant with
> this change, and found that I was not. The l10n eclass makes use of
> the LINGUAS USE_EXPAND and isn't covered in the tracker bug. I
> attempted to read through the ol
On 06/23/2016 05:04 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> I have created tracker bug https://bugs.gentoo.org/586734 for the
> LINGUAS to L10N conversion, and started to file bugs for individual
> packages. (Starting with lightweight stuff like metapackages, so users
> won't spend too much time with rebuildin
On 06/23/2016 02:04 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> I have created tracker bug https://bugs.gentoo.org/586734 for the
> LINGUAS to L10N conversion, and started to file bugs for individual
> packages. (Starting with lightweight stuff like metapackages, so users
> won't spend too much time with rebuildin
