On Mon, 16 Feb 2015 10:59:06 -0500
Joshua Kinard wrote:
> Once we complete the git migration, why not take a second look on
> using a stable/testing/unstable (or -RELEASE/-STABLE/-CURRENT) system
> used by Debian and FreeBSD? That should be entirely doable under a
> git tree versus CVS. It woul
Dnia 2015-02-16, o godz. 10:37:12
William Hubbs napisał(a):
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 02:34:50PM +0100, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > Every day I am hitting tons of blockers stabilizations and keywording
> > requests for alpha, sparc, ia64, ppc and ppc64.
> >
> > Again, I would suggest
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Joshua Kinard wrote:
>
> Keep the core git tree constantly rolling forward, have a dedicated branch get
> cut say, once a year (or less -- Debian is ~18mo?), another group of devs
> works
> on stabilizing that (and periodically cherrypicking from the master branc
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 02:34:50PM +0100, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Hello
>
> Every day I am hitting tons of blockers stabilizations and keywording
> requests for alpha, sparc, ia64, ppc and ppc64.
>
> Again, I would suggest to either decrease radically the amount of stable
> packages of some of that
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 02:34:50PM +0100, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Hello
>
> Every day I am hitting tons of blockers stabilizations and keywording
> requests for alpha, sparc, ia64, ppc and ppc64.
>
> Again, I would suggest to either decrease radically the amount of stable
> packages of some of that
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
>> They come from multiple places, for example I am now fighting with
>> getting ipython finally stabilized after months of waiting because the
>> deps hell in python packages (as package A needs package B, B needs C
>> and D maintained by
On 02/16/15 11:05, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El lun, 16-02-2015 a las 10:36 -0500, Anthony G. Basile escribió:
On 02/16/15 08:34, Pacho Ramos wrote:
Hello
Every day I am hitting tons of blockers stabilizations and keywording
requests for alpha, sparc, ia64, ppc and ppc64.
The powerpc team figured we
El lun, 16-02-2015 a las 10:36 -0500, Anthony G. Basile escribió:
> On 02/16/15 08:34, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > Every day I am hitting tons of blockers stabilizations and keywording
> > requests for alpha, sparc, ia64, ppc and ppc64.
>
> The powerpc team figured we'd deal with this by
On 02/16/2015 10:36, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> On 02/16/15 08:34, Pacho Ramos wrote:
>> Hello
>>
>> Every day I am hitting tons of blockers stabilizations and keywording
>> requests for alpha, sparc, ia64, ppc and ppc64.
>
> The powerpc team figured we'd deal with this by being "lax" about
> keyw
On 02/16/15 08:34, Pacho Ramos wrote:
Hello
Every day I am hitting tons of blockers stabilizations and keywording
requests for alpha, sparc, ia64, ppc and ppc64.
The powerpc team figured we'd deal with this by being "lax" about
keywording/stabilization and catch problems in subsequent bug rep
El lun, 16-02-2015 a las 10:09 -0500, Rich Freeman escribió:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 8:34 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> >
> > The current policy of maintainers dropping keywords after 90 days is
> > simply not applied because it leads up to that maintainer needing to
> > kill himself that keyword and
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 8:34 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
>
> The current policy of maintainers dropping keywords after 90 days is
> simply not applied because it leads up to that maintainer needing to
> kill himself that keyword and ALL the reverse deps keywords
A published script might ease that, esp
12 matches
Mail list logo
