05.06.2013 01:16, Samuli Suominen пишет:
> On 05/06/13 00:09, Pacho Ramos wrote:
>> It lacks a maintainer for a long time, also has some opened bugs and I
>> am unsure if it's still needed. I am not using it for months and never
>> saw any problem, also, portage fixes .la files by itself, and palud
On 05/06/13 00:09, Pacho Ramos wrote:
It lacks a maintainer for a long time, also has some opened bugs and I
am unsure if it's still needed. I am not using it for months and never
saw any problem, also, portage fixes .la files by itself, and paludis
people don't approve lafilefixer.
Do we still
