On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 07:44:57PM -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> On 07/30/14 17:18, Joseph Jezak wrote:
> > On 07/30/2014 06:26 AM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> >> On 07/29/14 22:16, Jack Morgan wrote:
> >>> On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 04:29:51PM -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> On 07/26/14 09:
On 07/30/14 17:18, Joseph Jezak wrote:
On 07/30/2014 06:26 AM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
On 07/29/14 22:16, Jack Morgan wrote:
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 04:29:51PM -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
On 07/26/14 09:44, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El sáb, 26-07-2014 a las 09:37 -0400, Anthony G. Basile escrib
On 07/30/2014 06:26 AM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
On 07/29/14 22:16, Jack Morgan wrote:
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 04:29:51PM -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
On 07/26/14 09:44, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El sáb, 26-07-2014 a las 09:37 -0400, Anthony G. Basile escribió:
On 07/26/14 09:28, Pacho Ramos wrot
On 07/29/14 22:16, Jack Morgan wrote:
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 04:29:51PM -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
On 07/26/14 09:44, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El sáb, 26-07-2014 a las 09:37 -0400, Anthony G. Basile escribió:
On 07/26/14 09:28, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El sáb, 26-07-2014 a las 14:55 +0200, Andreas
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 04:29:51PM -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> On 07/26/14 09:44, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > El sáb, 26-07-2014 a las 09:37 -0400, Anthony G. Basile escribió:
> >> On 07/26/14 09:28, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> >>> El sáb, 26-07-2014 a las 14:55 +0200, Andreas K. Huettel escribió:
>
On 07/26/14 18:01, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El sáb, 26-07-2014 a las 16:29 -0400, Anthony G. Basile escribió:
On 07/26/14 09:44, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El sáb, 26-07-2014 a las 09:37 -0400, Anthony G. Basile escribió:
On 07/26/14 09:28, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El sáb, 26-07-2014 a las 14:55 +0200, Andreas K
El sáb, 26-07-2014 a las 16:29 -0400, Anthony G. Basile escribió:
> On 07/26/14 09:44, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > El sáb, 26-07-2014 a las 09:37 -0400, Anthony G. Basile escribió:
> >> On 07/26/14 09:28, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> >>> El sáb, 26-07-2014 a las 14:55 +0200, Andreas K. Huettel escribió:
>
On 07/26/14 09:44, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El sáb, 26-07-2014 a las 09:37 -0400, Anthony G. Basile escribió:
On 07/26/14 09:28, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El sáb, 26-07-2014 a las 14:55 +0200, Andreas K. Huettel escribió:
Am Samstag, 26. Juli 2014, 13:56:02 schrieb Pacho Ramos:
I guess we will need to wa
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 06:31:50PM +0200, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> Am Samstag, 26. Juli 2014, 18:20:11 schrieb William Hubbs:
> > I know I'm replying to my own message, but I do have a concern about
> > this that I want to ask about.
> >
> > When a stable request is filed for a package, it is
Am Samstag, 26. Juli 2014, 18:20:11 schrieb William Hubbs:
> I know I'm replying to my own message, but I do have a concern about
> this that I want to ask about.
>
> When a stable request is filed for a package, it is filed for all
> architectures which have the ~arch keyword for the package and
I know I'm replying to my own message, but I do have a concern about
this that I want to ask about.
When a stable request is filed for a package, it is filed for all
architectures which have the ~arch keyword for the package and are
marked stable or dev in profiles.desc.
If an arch wants to stay
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 10:44:26AM +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El sáb, 26-07-2014 a las 10:36 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió:
> > El vie, 25-07-2014 a las 15:07 -0500, William Hubbs escribió:
> > > On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 03:57:20PM -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> > > > On 07/25/14 15:50, Pacho Ramo
El sáb, 26-07-2014 a las 09:37 -0400, Anthony G. Basile escribió:
> On 07/26/14 09:28, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > El sáb, 26-07-2014 a las 14:55 +0200, Andreas K. Huettel escribió:
> >> Am Samstag, 26. Juli 2014, 13:56:02 schrieb Pacho Ramos:
> >>
> >>> I guess we will need to wait for the next Council
On 07/26/14 09:28, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El sáb, 26-07-2014 a las 14:55 +0200, Andreas K. Huettel escribió:
Am Samstag, 26. Juli 2014, 13:56:02 schrieb Pacho Ramos:
I guess we will need to wait for the next Council to officially decide
to do this as it will be a big change for ppc* users :/ (I re
El sáb, 26-07-2014 a las 14:55 +0200, Andreas K. Huettel escribió:
> Am Samstag, 26. Juli 2014, 13:56:02 schrieb Pacho Ramos:
>
> > I guess we will need to wait for the next Council to officially decide
> > to do this as it will be a big change for ppc* users :/ (I remember
> > their action was ne
El sáb, 26-07-2014 a las 08:23 -0400, Rich Freeman escribió:
> On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 7:56 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> >
> > I guess we will need to wait for the next Council to officially decide
> > to do this as it will be a big change for ppc* users :/ (I remember
> > their action was needed for
Am Samstag, 26. Juli 2014, 13:56:02 schrieb Pacho Ramos:
> I guess we will need to wait for the next Council to officially decide
> to do this as it will be a big change for ppc* users :/ (I remember
> their action was needed for the move to testing of some arches and the
> "package-by-package" pr
Am Samstag, 26. Juli 2014, 10:44:26 schrieb Pacho Ramos:
> > But, moving ppc* to exp wouldn't lead us to likely break their tree?
> > (because we wouldn't get any dependency issue even with "base"
> > packages...)
>
> I was thinking in this plan:
> - Get a list with all packages stable on ppc
> -
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 7:56 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
>
> I guess we will need to wait for the next Council to officially decide
> to do this as it will be a big change for ppc* users :/ (I remember
> their action was needed for the move to testing of some arches and the
> "package-by-package" propo
On 07/26/14 07:59, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El sáb, 26-07-2014 a las 13:57 +0200, Manuel Rüger escribió:
[...]
+1 from ruby.
How do we solve keyword requests?
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=477648 is ~ 12 months and hasn't
seen any reply from the ppc* teams.
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.
El sáb, 26-07-2014 a las 13:57 +0200, Manuel Rüger escribió:
[...]
> +1 from ruby.
>
> How do we solve keyword requests?
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=477648 is ~ 12 months and hasn't
> seen any reply from the ppc* teams.
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=497396 ~ 6 months
> ht
On 07/26/2014 11:09 AM, Johannes Huber wrote:
> Am Samstag, 26. Juli 2014, 10:44:26 schrieb Pacho Ramos:
>> El sáb, 26-07-2014 a las 10:36 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió:
>>> El vie, 25-07-2014 a las 15:07 -0500, William Hubbs escribió:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 03:57:20PM -0400, Anthony G. Basile
El sáb, 26-07-2014 a las 07:47 -0400, Anthony G. Basile escribió:
> On 07/26/14 07:36, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > El sáb, 26-07-2014 a las 06:22 -0400, Anthony G. Basile escribió:
> > [...]
> >> 1) I don't think we need to drop to exp if we do this right.
> >>
> >> 2) I like this plan. Its not that we
On 07/26/14 07:36, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El sáb, 26-07-2014 a las 06:22 -0400, Anthony G. Basile escribió:
[...]
1) I don't think we need to drop to exp if we do this right.
2) I like this plan. Its not that we'll drop the whole arch to ~ at
once but trim at our discretion. Less chance of breaki
On 26/07/14 13:22, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> On 07/26/14 04:44, Pacho Ramos wrote:
>> El sáb, 26-07-2014 a las 10:36 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió:
>>> El vie, 25-07-2014 a las 15:07 -0500, William Hubbs escribió:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 03:57:20PM -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> On 07/2
El sáb, 26-07-2014 a las 06:22 -0400, Anthony G. Basile escribió:
[...]
> 1) I don't think we need to drop to exp if we do this right.
>
> 2) I like this plan. Its not that we'll drop the whole arch to ~ at
> once but trim at our discretion. Less chance of breaking everything.
>
Looks like we
Am Samstag, 26. Juli 2014, 10:44:26 schrieb Pacho Ramos:
> El sáb, 26-07-2014 a las 10:36 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió:
> > El vie, 25-07-2014 a las 15:07 -0500, William Hubbs escribió:
> > > On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 03:57:20PM -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> > > > On 07/25/14 15:50, Pacho Ramos wr
On 07/26/14 04:44, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El sáb, 26-07-2014 a las 10:36 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió:
El vie, 25-07-2014 a las 15:07 -0500, William Hubbs escribió:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 03:57:20PM -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
On 07/25/14 15:50, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El vie, 25-07-2014 a las 15:
El sáb, 26-07-2014 a las 10:36 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió:
> El vie, 25-07-2014 a las 15:07 -0500, William Hubbs escribió:
> > On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 03:57:20PM -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> > > On 07/25/14 15:50, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > > > El vie, 25-07-2014 a las 15:38 -0400, Anthony G. Bas
El vie, 25-07-2014 a las 15:07 -0500, William Hubbs escribió:
> On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 03:57:20PM -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> > On 07/25/14 15:50, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > > El vie, 25-07-2014 a las 15:38 -0400, Anthony G. Basile escribió:
> > >> On 07/25/14 15:28, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > >>> T
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 03:57:20PM -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> On 07/25/14 15:50, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > El vie, 25-07-2014 a las 15:38 -0400, Anthony G. Basile escribió:
> >> On 07/25/14 15:28, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> >>> That is the reason for me thinking that maybe the way to go would be to
>
On 07/25/14 15:50, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El vie, 25-07-2014 a las 15:38 -0400, Anthony G. Basile escribió:
On 07/25/14 15:28, Pacho Ramos wrote:
That is the reason for me thinking that maybe the way to go would be to
do the opposite -> keep only base-system and a few others stable and
drop stable
El vie, 25-07-2014 a las 15:38 -0400, Anthony G. Basile escribió:
> On 07/25/14 15:28, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > That is the reason for me thinking that maybe the way to go would be to
> > do the opposite -> keep only base-system and a few others stable and
> > drop stable for most of the rest. This b
On 07/25/14 15:28, Pacho Ramos wrote:
That is the reason for me thinking that maybe the way to go would be to
do the opposite -> keep only base-system and a few others stable and
drop stable for most of the rest. This big effort could be accomplished
in a week by other developers willing to help
34 matches
Mail list logo
