On Tuesday 13 March 2007, Dan Meltzer wrote:
> On 3/13/07, Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I was trying to show spb that reading personal attacks against oneself in
> > this forum is not a nice feeling. It was a stupid, priggish thing to do.
>
> Ya think?
adding sarcastic replies to the
On 3/13/07, Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Duncan wrote:
> Has anyone stopped to think... he might have an ulterior motive here?
>
> Clearly, it's trolling, the quote above should demonstrate that beyond
> doubt. However, one must ask what the reason might be for such
> deliberate trolls.
Steve Long wrote:
> Oh no of course not. Paludis is in fact being led in the most appropriate
> political fashion, rather than the best technical approach for the job.
Dear Steve,
this is a formal request from an ordinary Gentoo developer who has
already emailed you privately several times asking
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 17:46:41 + Steve Long
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stephen Bennett wrote:
> > Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> The EAPI=0 document was supposed to be a QA project. What it is
> >> now, I have no idea.
> >
> > A QA subproject which has not yet released
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 17:46:41 +
Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Except it's one that needs Paludis ready before it can be considered
> complete. /me thinks are they really that clever? /me remembers
> ciaranm's incredibly smart posts from ~2 years ago when he couldn't
> stand being trea
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 18:00:09 +
Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes so in a /technical/ sense he's the lead. You defer to his greater
> knowledge. Or are you more political than technical?
Nowhere did I say anything of the sort. Stop jumping to conclusions
based on incorrect assumption
Steve Long wrote: [Mon Mar 12 2007, 12:51:17PM CDT]
> Stephen Bennett wrote:
> > On Sat, 3 Mar 2007 01:58:30 -0800 (PST)
> > "Alec Warner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And if we didn't give a d*mn about such a distinction? IOW if you were
> discussing this technically, instead of /politically/ *sho
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> You like to think it, but it doesn't make it true. But hey, it's so
> much easier to think that I'm the great Gentoo boogeyman, isn't it?
We need a scary entity and Vapier isn't scary enough...
lu
--
Luca Barbato
Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero
On Sat, 03 Mar 2007 08:33:38 -0600 Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > I was kicked for suggesting that a) ppc-macos was breaking the tree,
> > staffed by people who don't know what they're doing, a QA nightmare
> > and damaging to the project, b) that pathspec was vap
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ryan Hill wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>
>> I was kicked for suggesting that a) ppc-macos was breaking the tree,
>> staffed by people who don't know what they're doing, a QA nightmare and
>> damaging to the project, b) that pathspec was vapourware
10 matches
Mail list logo
