On Friday 15 May 2009 21:06:13 Steven J Long wrote:
> In practical terms, this is a useless proposal. It rightly got trashed
> last year.
No, it did not get "trashed", despite some people's attempts to make their
side sound more popular than it really is. Some people like the idea, some
don't,
On Fri, 15 May 2009 21:06:13 +0100
Steven J Long wrote:
> > Before an ebuild has had its metadata generated, its EAPI is
> > unknown. At this point, the package manager assumes EAPI 0.
> >
> With the format restriction, that everyone last year seemed happy
> with, apart from the few pushing GLEP-5
