-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Long wrote:
> As for potentially useful, so was Internet Explorer, last time I looked at
> what you could do with its Object Model. I still ain't voting to bring it
> to Gentoo.. ;)
Looks like you lost your vote :)
# ChangeLog for app-emulation
On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 21:11 +0200, Wernfried Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 11:39:26AM -0700, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > Internet Explorer doesn't even *run* on Gentoo. If it did, it
> > would likely be in the tree since quite a few people would likely use
> > it, even if just for testing.
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 11:39:26AM -0700, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> Internet Explorer doesn't even *run* on Gentoo. If it did, it
> would likely be in the tree since quite a few people would likely use
> it, even if just for testing. I know that if I were able to test things
> on IE from Linux wi
On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 08:58 +, Duncan wrote:
> So at this point it's pretty much up to the maintainer. Why are the rest
> of us still discussing it?
Because, like everything else, too many people on this list have to get
in the last word.
Also, there's nothing in our policy that really keep
On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 06:01 +0100, Steve Long wrote:
> Stephen Bennett wrote:
> > Not everyone sees that as a reason not to use a potentially useful
> > piece of software. We're not debian.
>
> Could you clarify whether this is indeed a Gentoo QA issue, or in fact a
> licensing issue? If the latte
On Sun, 2007-06-17 at 20:05 +0100, Steve Long wrote:
> keep. Or is it that Skype are a big company so we have to kowtow? /me is
> well-confused.
It has nothing to do with money or the company, and everything to do
with the number of people using it. While ion3 is uncommonly used,
skype is much mo
Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
Steve Long wrote:
Stephen Bennett wrote:
Not everyone sees that as a reason not to use a potentially useful
piece of software. We're not debian.
Could you clarify whether this is indeed a Gentoo QA issue, or in fact a
licensing issue? If the latter case, this discuss
Steve Long wrote:
Stephen Bennett wrote:
Not everyone sees that as a reason not to use a potentially useful
piece of software. We're not debian.
Could you clarify whether this is indeed a Gentoo QA issue, or in fact a
licensing issue? If the latter case, this discussion should prob'y go to
the
