On Thu, 28 May 2009 00:54:40 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > None needed, seems to be the major voice.
>
> So it's your opinion that Gentoo should go with an in every way
> inferior solution that doesn't solve the problem as well?
I was merely overstating the obvious.
jer
On Thu, 28 May 2009 01:48:34 +0200
Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Thu, 28 May 2009 00:45:18 +0100
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Wed, 27 May 2009 23:26:25 + (UTC)
> > Mark Bateman wrote:
> > > NOT once within GLEP55 [...]
>
> > Not once has there been an equally good alternative proposed.
>
>
On Thu, 28 May 2009 00:45:18 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 27 May 2009 23:26:25 + (UTC)
> Mark Bateman wrote:
> > NOT once within GLEP55 [...]
> Not once has there been an equally good alternative proposed.
None needed, seems to be the major voice.
jer
On Wed, 27 May 2009 23:26:25 + (UTC)
Mark Bateman wrote:
> NOT once within GLEP55 or in all the ml posts over all the *MONTHS*
> has there been unequivocal proof that encoding metadata into the
> filename of an ebuild is a necessity, so please stop playing that
> tune it is getting boring
Not
