On 21-10-2008 16:09:12 +0200, Tiziano Müller wrote:
> > As "Gentoo Solaris" would not be the same as "Gentoo Prefix on Solaris",
> > it should not share the *-solaris keywords used for Prefix via the same
> > KEYWORDS-setting.
> what about a new generic schema like: CPU-OS[-prefix] with the possibi
On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 19:59 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 13-10-2008 15:27:10 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 06:16:01 +0100
> > Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Unless someone can say what using PROPERTIES=prefix would break, I'd
> > > go with that. It's a /cl
On 13-10-2008 15:27:10 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 06:16:01 +0100
> Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Unless someone can say what using PROPERTIES=prefix would break, I'd
> > go with that. It's a /classic/ usage of that variable, as it's simply
> > a boolean; PROPERT
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 06:16:01 +0100
Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unless someone can say what using PROPERTIES=prefix would break, I'd
> go with that. It's a /classic/ usage of that variable, as it's simply
> a boolean; PROPERTIES is well-defined and I'm hoping all the manglers
> support i
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 17:56:37 +0200
Marius Mauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:48:19 +0200
> Fabian Groffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Whatever. Some of you seem to have some quite agressive dislikement
> > to it. In the end it's just a name/tag. I guess I could live
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:48:19 +0200
Fabian Groffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Whatever. Some of you seem to have some quite agressive dislikement
> to it. In the end it's just a name/tag. I guess I could live with
> anything, including c3p0.
Well, while I dislike x64 I'm more concerned about
On 10-10-2008 14:40:13 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> Fabian Groffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > - x64 is what the vendors (Apple, Sun) advertise themselves
>
> Err I'm sure I haven't seen any x64 in the documentation or
> advertisement of my MacBook Pro, are you sure _Apple_ use
On 10-10-2008 04:21:23 +0200, Marius Mauch wrote:
> > >> amd64-linux
> > >> x64-openbsd
> > >> x64-solaris
> > >
> > > Is there a special reason why you're using "x64" instead of "amd64"
> > > in those cases? (IMO x64 is the most stupid name for the x86_64
> > > architecture)
> >
> > AFAIK, th
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:16:10 + (UTC)
Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Marius Mauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri,
> 10 Oct 2008 00:05:00 +0200:
>
> > On Thu, 9 Oct 2008 20:11:01 +0200
> > Fabian Groffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>amd6
