Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [GLEP] RFC - Keywording scheme

2007-04-25 Thread Fabian Groffen
Hi Grant, Rémi and Yuri, On 25-04-2007 20:30:45 -0500, Yuri Vasilevski wrote: > On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 23:39:47 +0200 > Rémi Cardona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Grant Goodyear a écrit : > > > Fabian Groffen wrote: [Sat Apr 14 2007, 03:33:03AM CDT] > > >> For people that like reading it in html

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [GLEP] RFC - Keywording scheme

2007-04-25 Thread Yuri Vasilevski
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 23:39:47 +0200 Rémi Cardona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Grant Goodyear a écrit : > > Fabian Groffen wrote: [Sat Apr 14 2007, 03:33:03AM CDT] > >> For people that like reading it in html or via the web: > >> http://dev.gentoo.org/~grobian/gleps/glep-keywords.html > >> http://de

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [GLEP] RFC - Keywording scheme

2007-04-25 Thread Rémi Cardona
Grant Goodyear a écrit : Fabian Groffen wrote: [Sat Apr 14 2007, 03:33:03AM CDT] For people that like reading it in html or via the web: http://dev.gentoo.org/~grobian/gleps/glep-keywords.html http://dev.gentoo.org/~grobian/gleps/glep-keywords.txt So what would a version of Gentoo for amd64 ba

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [GLEP] RFC - Keywording scheme

2007-04-25 Thread Grant Goodyear
Fabian Groffen wrote: [Sat Apr 14 2007, 03:33:03AM CDT] > For people that like reading it in html or via the web: > http://dev.gentoo.org/~grobian/gleps/glep-keywords.html > http://dev.gentoo.org/~grobian/gleps/glep-keywords.txt So what would a version of Gentoo for amd64 based on FreeBSD but usin

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [GLEP] RFC - Keywording scheme

2007-04-25 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 09:35 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote: > Hereby I would like to request the counsel to discuss this mini-GLEP in > the first meeting for which this request is in time. You got this in just in time for the next Council meeting. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering Strategic L

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [GLEP] RFC - Keywording scheme

2007-04-25 Thread Fabian Groffen
Hereby I would like to request the counsel to discuss this mini-GLEP in the first meeting for which this request is in time. On 14-04-2007 10:33:03 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote: > On 14-04-2007 01:19:41 -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 07:32:12AM +0100, Steve Long wrote:

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [GLEP] RFC - Keywording scheme

2007-04-17 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 11:19 +1200, Christopher Sawtell wrote: > On Tuesday 17 April 2007 01:10:20 Chris Gianelloni wrote: > [ ... ] > > > Yeah, ulimit won't do it. We hit this issue with mimedefang, actually. > > Our problem is that the kernel is doing the limiting. We ended up > > having to spl

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [GLEP] RFC - Keywording scheme

2007-04-16 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 11:19:24AM +1200, Christopher Sawtell wrote: > > Yeah, ulimit won't do it. We hit this issue with mimedefang, actually. > > Our problem is that the kernel is doing the limiting. We ended up > > having to split things up a good bit into multiple processes to get > > everyth

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [GLEP] RFC - Keywording scheme

2007-04-16 Thread Christopher Sawtell
On Tuesday 17 April 2007 01:10:20 Chris Gianelloni wrote: [ ... ] > Yeah, ulimit won't do it. We hit this issue with mimedefang, actually. > Our problem is that the kernel is doing the limiting. We ended up > having to split things up a good bit into multiple processes to get > everything workin

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [GLEP] RFC - Keywording scheme

2007-04-16 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 05:03 -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 07:50:58AM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > > On Sat, 2007-04-14 at 05:41 -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > > > Anybody that feels like inspecting C code, look at mlmmj-1.2.14/src. > > > getaddrsfromfd.c:27 - this m

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [GLEP] RFC - Keywording scheme

2007-04-16 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 07:50:58AM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > On Sat, 2007-04-14 at 05:41 -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > > Anybody that feels like inspecting C code, look at mlmmj-1.2.14/src. > > getaddrsfromfd.c:27 - this mmap fails, 'Could not mmap fd: Invalid argument' > > mlmmj-send.c >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [GLEP] RFC - Keywording scheme

2007-04-16 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Sat, 2007-04-14 at 05:41 -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > Anybody that feels like inspecting C code, look at mlmmj-1.2.14/src. > getaddrsfromfd.c:27 - this mmap fails, 'Could not mmap fd: Invalid argument' > mlmmj-send.c Is it possible we're hitting > 1024 fd open? We have had a similar proble

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [GLEP] RFC - Keywording scheme

2007-04-14 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 07:47:12AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > Because I don't have it either, luckily there is GMane: > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/48017 > ive found hooking up my NNTP client to GMane and downloading missed e-mails > from there works quite well > > if

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [GLEP] RFC - Keywording scheme

2007-04-14 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Saturday 14 April 2007, Fabian Groffen wrote: > On 14-04-2007 01:19:41 -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 07:32:12AM +0100, Steve Long wrote: > > > Fabian Groffen wrote: > > > > This GLEP has been laying around for some long time now in my gleps > > > > dir. I nearly forg

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [GLEP] RFC - Keywording scheme

2007-04-14 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 14-04-2007 01:19:41 -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 07:32:12AM +0100, Steve Long wrote: > > Fabian Groffen wrote: > > > This GLEP has been laying around for some long time now in my gleps dir. > > > I nearly forgot about it. Anyway, feedback is appreciated. > > > Grob

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [GLEP] RFC - Keywording scheme

2007-04-14 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 07:32:12AM +0100, Steve Long wrote: > Fabian Groffen wrote: > > This GLEP has been laying around for some long time now in my gleps dir. > > I nearly forgot about it. Anyway, feedback is appreciated. Grobian: can you please resend your message to the list? This is the se