Re: [gentoo-dev] [warning] the bug queue has 118 bugs

2010-12-29 Thread Rich Freeman
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > please refrain from posting html to mailing lists Apologies - just migrated to Gmail and didn't notice the obnoxious default behavior... Rich

Re: [gentoo-dev] [warning] the bug queue has 118 bugs

2010-12-28 Thread Mike Frysinger
please refrain from posting html to mailing lists -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] [warning] the bug queue has 118 bugs

2010-12-28 Thread George Prowse
On 28/12/2010 21:11, Rich Freeman wrote: On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Jeroen Roovers > wrote: On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 23:31:28 +0100 Maciej Mrozowski mailto:reave...@gmail.com>> wrote: > Well, before I became developer, I had a quite unproductive > di

Re: [gentoo-dev] [warning] the bug queue has 118 bugs

2010-12-28 Thread Mike Gilbert
On 12/28/2010 04:11 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > 2. Bug is missing required info or seems vague. Immediately add a comment > stating what is needed, with link to website with bug submission procedure > that wasn't followed, and resolve invalid. Comment should welcome submitter > to re-open with the

Re: [gentoo-dev] [warning] the bug queue has 118 bugs

2010-12-28 Thread Rich Freeman
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 23:31:28 +0100 > Maciej Mrozowski wrote: > > > Well, before I became developer, I had a quite unproductive > > discussion on IRC with Jeroen on that matter (jer opting for status > > quo and telling me I have no idea wh

Re: [gentoo-dev] [warning] the bug queue has 118 bugs

2010-12-27 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 23:31:28 +0100 Maciej Mrozowski wrote: > Well, before I became developer, I had a quite unproductive > discussion on IRC with Jeroen on that matter (jer opting for status > quo and telling me I have no idea what bug wrangling is :P) I have no idea what you are talking about.

Re: [gentoo-dev] [warning] the bug queue has 118 bugs

2010-12-17 Thread Dale
Maciej Mrozowski wrote: On Wednesday 15 of December 2010 17:03:12 Matt Turner wrote: On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:25 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: By the way, we have a nice team of arch and herd testers - how about encouraging them to wrangle some bugs? Yeah, I just came h

Re: [gentoo-dev] [warning] the bug queue has 118 bugs

2010-12-17 Thread Maciej Mrozowski
On Wednesday 15 of December 2010 17:03:12 Matt Turner wrote: > On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:25 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." > > wrote: > > By the way, we have a nice team of arch and herd testers - how about > > encouraging them to wrangle some bugs? > > Yeah, I just came here to say this. One certainl

Re: [gentoo-dev] [warning] the bug queue has 118 bugs

2010-12-15 Thread Matt Turner
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:25 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > By the way, we have a nice team of arch and herd testers - how about > encouraging them to wrangle some bugs? Yeah, I just came here to say this. One certainly doesn't need to have completed the developer quizzes to sort bugs. Matt

Re: [gentoo-dev] [warning] the bug queue has 118 bugs

2010-12-15 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
On 12/15/10 2:54 AM, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > I am starting to wonder if this is helping. It looks like everyone now > attempts to keep it <100 on a daily basis, but not to far <100, which > means a lot of old, difficult, nasty bug reports are left unattended. > Still, I got it down to about two doz

Re: [gentoo-dev] [warning] the bug queue has 118 bugs

2010-12-15 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday, December 14, 2010 20:54:45 Jeroen Roovers wrote: > On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 14:00:02 +0200 (EET) Alex Alexander wrote: > > Our bug queue has 118 bugs! > > I am starting to wonder if this is helping. It looks like everyone now > attempts to keep it <100 on a daily basis, but not to far <100,

Re: [gentoo-dev] [warning] the bug queue has 118 bugs

2010-12-14 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 14:00:02 +0200 (EET) Alex Alexander wrote: > Our bug queue has 118 bugs! I am starting to wonder if this is helping. It looks like everyone now attempts to keep it <100 on a daily basis, but not to far <100, which means a lot of old, difficult, nasty bug reports are left unat