Re: [gentoo-dev] [experiment] Sunrise try 2

2006-06-28 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 25 June 2006 01:39, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Saturday 24 June 2006 18:54, Edward Catmur wrote: > > * Security (from malicious contributors): Glad to see layman will only > > track the reviewed/ tree; still, anyone who checks out the sunrise/ tree > > (and has it in PORTDIR_OVERLAY) is v

Re: [gentoo-dev] [experiment] Sunrise try 2

2006-06-24 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Saturday 24 June 2006 18:54, Edward Catmur wrote: > * Security (from malicious contributors): Glad to see layman will only > track the reviewed/ tree; still, anyone who checks out the sunrise/ tree > (and has it in PORTDIR_OVERLAY) is vulnerable. > > - Remove from the examples any suggestion tha

Re: [gentoo-dev] [experiment] Sunrise try 2

2006-06-24 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Saturday 24 June 2006 09:12, Thomas Cort wrote: > http://gentoo-sunrise.org/cgi-bin/trac.cgi/wiki/HowToCommit this is a stupid nit pick thing (but i'm good at that) the examples should use $ as the shell prompt, not # pwnt! -mike pgpQu9Pb2ha9V.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] [experiment] Sunrise try 2

2006-06-24 Thread Donnie Berkholz
Luca Barbato wrote: > Edward Catmur wrote: > Critic 4 >> * Conflicts between contributors (social): Alice adds an ebuild; Bob >> makes a (maybe "obvious") change; Alice thinks the change is incorrect, >> and, feeling that the ebuild is her property, reverts the change. A >> revert war erupts. Many

Re: [gentoo-dev] [experiment] Sunrise try 2

2006-06-24 Thread Luca Barbato
Edward Catmur wrote: > On Sat, 2006-06-24 at 13:05 +0200, Luca Barbato wrote: >> (from critics) >> - What is wrong with the model (each point 2 lines at least, 4 at most) >> - What you'd do as alternative as the criticized point ( 2 lines again) Let me reformat a bit > Critic 1 > * Simplicity: Th

Re: [gentoo-dev] [experiment] Sunrise try 2

2006-06-24 Thread Edward Catmur
On Sat, 2006-06-24 at 13:05 +0200, Luca Barbato wrote: > (from critics) > - What is wrong with the model (each point 2 lines at least, 4 at most) > - What you'd do as alternative as the criticized point ( 2 lines again) * Simplicity: The FAQ claims that Sunrise is simpler than Bugzilla. It is - fo

Re: [gentoo-dev] [experiment] Sunrise try 2

2006-06-24 Thread Georgi Georgiev
maillog: 24/06/2006-09:12:59(-0400): Thomas Cort types > > What I need: > > (from proponents) > > - A list of issue sunrise wants to address (each point 2 lines at most) > > - How it will be implemented > > (from critics) > > - What is wrong with the model (each point 2 lines at least, 4 at most) >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [experiment] Sunrise try 2

2006-06-24 Thread Thomas Cort
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 15:36:23 +0200 Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It isn't in the format useful for a discussion point by point, genstef > is converting it, I hope. Yes, this is true. I was just pointing out that things have changed since the original proposal and that before people beg

Re: [gentoo-dev] [experiment] Sunrise try 2

2006-06-24 Thread Luca Barbato
Thomas Cort wrote: > > Before people start replying, they should make sure they are familiar > with the updated model/policies (read: they've changed since the > original discussion on -dev). The new stuff is available at: > http://gentoo-sunrise.org/cgi-bin/trac.cgi/wiki/SunriseFaq and > http://

Re: [gentoo-dev] [experiment] Sunrise try 2

2006-06-24 Thread Thomas Cort
> What I need: > (from proponents) > - A list of issue sunrise wants to address (each point 2 lines at most) > - How it will be implemented > (from critics) > - What is wrong with the model (each point 2 lines at least, 4 at most) > - What you'd do as alternative as the criticized point ( 2 lines a