On Sat, 01 Aug 2009 21:26:09 +0300
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> > += is bash 3.1, which isn't legal for use in the tree.
>
> It's been in use for a long time in xfce's ebuilds already, noone has
> ever complained. One can easily match some hundreds of ebuilds in tree
> where it's used.
Yes, unfortun
On 01-08-2009 21:26:09 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Sat, 01 Aug 2009 20:58:10 +0300
> > Samuli Suominen wrote:
> >> Improved version attached. EAPI checking modification.
> >
> >>2) EXPF+=" src_configure" ;;
> >
> > += is bash 3.1, which isn't legal for use i
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 01 Aug 2009 20:58:10 +0300
> Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> Improved version attached. EAPI checking modification.
>
>> 2) EXPF+=" src_configure" ;;
>
> += is bash 3.1, which isn't legal for use in the tree.
>
It's been in use for a long time in xfce's ebuilds
On Sat, 01 Aug 2009 20:58:10 +0300
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> Improved version attached. EAPI checking modification.
> 2) EXPF+=" src_configure" ;;
+= is bash 3.1, which isn't legal for use in the tree.
--
Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> Please comment if there's something to change. Keep it simple.
Improved version attached. EAPI checking modification.
Thanks, Samuli
# Copyright 1999-2009 Gentoo Foundation
# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
# $Header: $
# @ECLASS: xfconf
