2011/9/20 Michał Górny :
> On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:11:28 +0200
> Michal Hrusecky wrote:
>
>> please take a look at attached eclasses. Purpose is to make
>> installation of obs services (plugins for osc) easier.
>>
>> Comments and improvements are welcome.
>
> I don't get the concept of having two e
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:11:28 +0200
Michal Hrusecky wrote:
> please take a look at attached eclasses. Purpose is to make
> installation of obs services (plugins for osc) easier.
>
> Comments and improvements are welcome.
I don't get the concept of having two eclasses for this. The first one
look
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Marijn - 9:35 15.09.11 wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> On 09/14/11 10:56, Michal Hrusecky wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > new versions of eclasses after hopefully fixing most of the
> > comments.
> >
>
> The download eclass speaks about ``openSUSE Build Service'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Michal,
On 09/14/11 10:56, Michal Hrusecky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> new versions of eclasses after hopefully fixing most of the
> comments.
>
The download eclass speaks about ``openSUSE Build Service'' while the
other calls it the ``Open Build Service''
Ulrich Mueller - 11:56 14.09.11 wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 Sep 2011, Michal Hrusecky wrote:
> > new versions of eclasses after hopefully fixing most of the comments.
>
> > # @ECLASS-VARIABLE: OPENSUSE_RELEASE
> > # @ECLASS-VARIABLE: OBS_PROJECT
> > # @ECLASS-VARIABLE: OPENSUSE_PACKAGE
>
> Can't th
> On Wed, 14 Sep 2011, Michal Hrusecky wrote:
> new versions of eclasses after hopefully fixing most of the comments.
> # @ECLASS-VARIABLE: OPENSUSE_RELEASE
> # @ECLASS-VARIABLE: OBS_PROJECT
> # @ECLASS-VARIABLE: OPENSUSE_PACKAGE
Can't this use a single namespace, i.e. either "OBS" or "OPENSU
Hi,
new versions of eclasses after hopefully fixing most of the comments.
--
Michal Hrusecky
# Copyright 1999-2011 Gentoo Foundation
# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
# $Header: $
# @ECLASS: obs-download.eclass
# @MAINTAINER:
# mi...@gentoo.org
# @BLURB
Donnie Berkholz - 9:59 13.09.11 wrote:
> On 13:11 Tue 13 Sep , Michal Hrusecky wrote:
> > # Copyright 1999-2011 Gentoo Foundation
> > # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
> > # $Header: $
> >
> > # @ECLASS: obs-download.eclass
>
> Are there going to be lots of p
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 11:41:00 -0500
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Thanks for the reminder; I looked, and it turns out that we now have
> a great precedent. Quoting PMS:
>
> "The required bash version was retroactively updated from 3.0 to 3.2
> in November 2009 (see http://www.gentoo.
> org/proj/en/cou
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 17:58:15 +0200
Patrick Lauer wrote:
> > It's because people want to pretend that it's possible for
> > incredibly outdated systems (those with bash-3 only) to be updated.
>
> Actually it's worse - PMS enforces this, and the only clean way out is
> to patch/fix/extend PMS to al
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 20:40:12 +0200
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > On Tue, 13 Sep 2011, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > The current situation is that you can't even install bash-3.2
> > systemwide because of the number of packages [ebuilds/eclasses]
> > requiring on bash-4.
>
> Have you filed bug repor
> On Tue, 13 Sep 2011, Michał Górny wrote:
> The current situation is that you can't even install bash-3.2
> systemwide because of the number of packages [ebuilds/eclasses]
> requiring on bash-4.
Have you filed bug reports for these?
Ulrich
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 19:25:59 +0200
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > On Tue, 13 Sep 2011, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the reminder; I looked, and it turns out that we now have
> > a great precedent.
>
> > Quoting PMS:
>
> > "The required bash version was retroactively updated from 3.0
Excerpts from Ulrich Mueller's message of 2011-09-13 19:25:59 +0200:
> > On Tue, 13 Sep 2011, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the reminder; I looked, and it turns out that we now have
> > a great precedent.
>
> > Quoting PMS:
>
> > "The required bash version was retroactively updated
2011/9/13 Ulrich Mueller :
>> On Tue, 13 Sep 2011, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the reminder; I looked, and it turns out that we now have
>> a great precedent.
>
>> Quoting PMS:
>
>> "The required bash version was retroactively updated from 3.0 to 3.2
>> in November 2009 (see http://w
> On Tue, 13 Sep 2011, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Thanks for the reminder; I looked, and it turns out that we now have
> a great precedent.
> Quoting PMS:
> "The required bash version was retroactively updated from 3.0 to 3.2
> in November 2009 (see http://www.gentoo.
> org/proj/en/council/mee
On 17:58 Tue 13 Sep , Patrick Lauer wrote:
> On 09/13/11 16:44, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > It's because people want to pretend that it's possible for
> > incredibly outdated systems (those with bash-3 only) to be updated.
>
> Actually it's worse - PMS enforces this, and the only clean way out
On 09/13/11 16:44, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 15:02 Tue 13 Sep , Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote:
>> Excerpts from Joshua Kinard's message of 2011-09-13 14:26:02 +0200:
You don't need -n/-z with [[.
[[ $var ]] == [[ -n $var ]]
[[ ! $var ]] == [[ -z $var ]]
>>>
>>> What about o
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 8:29 PM, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>> HOMEPAGE="http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:OSC";
>> LICENSE="GPL-2"
>> SLOT="0"
>> IUSE=""
>> RDEPEND+="dev-util/osc"
>
> You probably want a space here.
>
> RDEPEND+=" dev-util/osc"
>
Slightly bike-sheddy, but it's less error-prone to use
On 13:11 Tue 13 Sep , Michal Hrusecky wrote:
> # Copyright 1999-2011 Gentoo Foundation
> # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
> # $Header: $
>
> # @ECLASS: obs-download.eclass
Are there going to be lots of packages using this and not the other
eclass? I wonder w
On 15:02 Tue 13 Sep , Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote:
> Excerpts from Joshua Kinard's message of 2011-09-13 14:26:02 +0200:
> > > You don't need -n/-z with [[.
> > >
> > > [[ $var ]] == [[ -n $var ]]
> > > [[ ! $var ]] == [[ -z $var ]]
> >
> > What about other comparisons, like -f, -e, or -d?
>
Amadeusz Żołnowski - 13:24 13.09.11 wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Excerpts from Michal Hrusecky's message of 2011-09-13 13:11:28 +0200:
> > Comments and improvements are welcome.
>
> Just some minor remarks:
>
>
> > [[ -z ${OPENSUSE_RELEASE} ]] || OBS_PROJECT="openSUSE:${OPENSUSE_RELEASE}"
> > [[ -n ${OB
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 15:02:43 +0200
Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote:
> OT: When I was going through recruitment process, dberkholz pointed to
> me that I use things bash4-only. And again: why we need to stick to
> ancient 3 version? I would understand pseudo POSIX compatibility, but
> what is the benefit
Excerpts from Joshua Kinard's message of 2011-09-13 14:26:02 +0200:
> > You don't need -n/-z with [[.
> >
> > [[ $var ]] == [[ -n $var ]]
> > [[ ! $var ]] == [[ -z $var ]]
>
> What about other comparisons, like -f, -e, or -d?
Same as inside [, but no need of quotes inside [[.
> Also, is thi
On 09/13/2011 07:24, Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Excerpts from Michal Hrusecky's message of 2011-09-13 13:11:28 +0200:
>> Comments and improvements are welcome.
>
> Just some minor remarks:
>
>
>> [[ -z ${OPENSUSE_RELEASE} ]] || OBS_PROJECT="openSUSE:${OPENSUSE_RELEASE}"
>> [[ -n ${
Hi,
Excerpts from Michal Hrusecky's message of 2011-09-13 13:11:28 +0200:
> Comments and improvements are welcome.
Just some minor remarks:
> [[ -z ${OPENSUSE_RELEASE} ]] || OBS_PROJECT="openSUSE:${OPENSUSE_RELEASE}"
> [[ -n ${OBS_PROJECT} ]] || die "OBS_PROJECT not set!"
> [[ -n ${OBS_PA
26 matches
Mail list logo
