-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 15/04/15 09:40 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> On 15/04/15 05:49 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>>> On Wed, 15 Apr 2015, Michał Górny wrote:
>
>>> This is problem with the CVS two-commit procedure. The only
>>> solution is to stop using CVS keyword
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 15/04/15 05:49 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> On Wed, 15 Apr 2015, Michał Górny wrote:
>
>> This is problem with the CVS two-commit procedure. The only
>> solution is to stop using CVS keywords which people don't want to
>> do because THEY ARE
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 5:58 AM, Jason Zaman wrote:
> I dont think it can be fixed without getting rid of the $Header$ line.
> I'd be all for it, those lines seem like more trouble than its worth to me.
Those problems cause headaches all over the place. I'll be very happy
to see them go when we
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 12:27:08PM +0300, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Apr 2015 11:06:22 +0200 Michał Górny wrote:
> > Dnia 2015-04-15, o godz. 11:59:12
> > Andrew Savchenko napisał(a):
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > why manifest signatures are still optional for repoman?
> > >
> > > Repoman
> On Wed, 15 Apr 2015, Michał Górny wrote:
> This is problem with the CVS two-commit procedure. The only solution
> is to stop using CVS keywords which people don't want to do because
> THEY ARE SO VERY USEFUL.
> Or make repoman do first commit without Manifest, so instead of
> unsigned Manif
On Wed, 15 Apr 2015 11:06:22 +0200 Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 2015-04-15, o godz. 11:59:12
> Andrew Savchenko napisał(a):
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > why manifest signatures are still optional for repoman?
> >
> > Repoman signatures are currently optional and this creates nasty
> > consequences: if signi
Dnia 2015-04-15, o godz. 11:59:12
Andrew Savchenko napisał(a):
> Hi,
>
> why manifest signatures are still optional for repoman?
>
> Repoman signatures are currently optional and this creates nasty
> consequences: if signing errors occurs, repoman still proceeds :/
>
> I just had a phone call
