Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] GLEP 74 post-Council review update [v5]

W dniu pią, 01.12.2017 o godzinie 12∶30 +0100, użytkownik Fabian Groffen napisał: > Hi, > > While trying to implement full tree Manifests for the Prefix tree, I ran > into the following: > > Would it be possible to add a section to define what directories receive > what kind of Manifest? > > I m

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] GLEP 74 post-Council review update [v5]

Hi, While trying to implement full tree Manifests for the Prefix tree, I ran into the following: Would it be possible to add a section to define what directories receive what kind of Manifest? I mean in particular what is encoded in gemato/profile.py, the metadata directory is an interesting mix

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] GLEP 74 post-Council review update [v5]

W dniu czw, 16.11.2017 o godzinie 11∶19 +0100, użytkownik Michał Górny napisał: > Hi, everyone. > > Here's the updated version of GLEP 74 taking into consideration > the points made during the Council pre-review. > > ReST: https://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/tmp/glep-0074.rst > HTML: https://dev.gento

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] GLEP 74 post-Council review update [v4]

> On Wed, 22 Nov 2017, Michał Górny wrote: > Path and filename encoding > -- > The path fields in the Manifest file must consist of characters > corresponding to valid UTF-8 code points excluding the NULL character > (``U+``), the backwards slash (``\``) and charac

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] GLEP 74 post-Council review update [v4]

W dniu czw, 16.11.2017 o godzinie 11∶19 +0100, użytkownik Michał Górny napisał: > Hi, everyone. > > Here's the updated version of GLEP 74 taking into consideration > the points made during the Council pre-review. > > ReST: https://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/tmp/glep-0074.rst > HTML: https://dev.gento

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] GLEP 74 post-Council review update [v2]

On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 2:02 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > W dniu wto, 21.11.2017 o godzinie 20∶59 -0600, użytkownik R0b0t1 > napisał: >> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Michał Górny wrote: >> > W dniu czw, 16.11.2017 o godzinie 11∶19 +0100, użytkownik Michał Górny >> > napisał: >> > > Hi, everyone

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] GLEP 74 post-Council review update [v2]

W dniu wto, 21.11.2017 o godzinie 20∶59 -0600, użytkownik R0b0t1 napisał: > On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > W dniu czw, 16.11.2017 o godzinie 11∶19 +0100, użytkownik Michał Górny > > napisał: > > > Hi, everyone. > > > > > > Here's the updated version of GLEP 74 taking in

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] GLEP 74 post-Council review update [v2]

> On Wed, 22 Nov 2017, Michał Górny wrote: > W dniu wto, 21.11.2017 o godzinie 22∶48 +0100, użytkownik Ulrich Mueller > napisał: >> > > > > > On Tue, 21 Nov 2017, Michał Górny wrote: >> > > > > > It is an error for a single file to be matched by multiple >> > > > > > entries of different seman

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] GLEP 74 post-Council review update [v2]

On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > W dniu czw, 16.11.2017 o godzinie 11∶19 +0100, użytkownik Michał Górny > napisał: >> Hi, everyone. >> >> Here's the updated version of GLEP 74 taking into consideration >> the points made during the Council pre-review. >> >> ReST: https://dev

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] GLEP 74 post-Council review update [v2]

W dniu wto, 21.11.2017 o godzinie 22∶48 +0100, użytkownik Ulrich Mueller napisał: > > > > > > On Tue, 21 Nov 2017, Michał Górny wrote: > > > > > > It is an error for a single file to be matched by multiple > > > > > > entries of different semantics, file size or checksum values. > > > > > > It is a

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] GLEP 74 post-Council review update [v2]

> On Tue, 21 Nov 2017, Michał Górny wrote: >> > > > It is an error for a single file to be matched by multiple >> > > > entries of different semantics, file size or checksum values. >> > > > It is an error to specify another entry for a file matching >> > > > ``IGNORE``, or one of its subdirec

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] GLEP 74 post-Council review update [v2]

W dniu wto, 21.11.2017 o godzinie 21∶28 +0100, użytkownik Ulrich Mueller napisał: > > > > > > On Tue, 21 Nov 2017, Michał Górny wrote: > > > > It is an error for a single file to be matched by multiple entries > > > > of different semantics, file size or checksum values. It is an error > > > > to s

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] GLEP 74 post-Council review update [v2]

> On Tue, 21 Nov 2017, Michał Górny wrote: >> > It is an error for a single file to be matched by multiple entries >> > of different semantics, file size or checksum values. It is an error >> > to specify another entry for a file matching ``IGNORE``, or one of its >> > subdirectories. >> >> W

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] GLEP 74 post-Council review update [v3]

W dniu wto, 21.11.2017 o godzinie 19∶20 +0100, użytkownik Ulrich Mueller napisał: > > > > > > On Tue, 21 Nov 2017, Michał Górny wrote: > > All paths specified in the Manifest file must consist of characters > > corresponding to valid UTF-8 code points excluding the NULL character > > (``U+``),

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] GLEP 74 post-Council review update [v3]

> On Tue, 21 Nov 2017, Michał Górny wrote: > All paths specified in the Manifest file must consist of characters > corresponding to valid UTF-8 code points excluding the NULL character > (``U+``), the backwards slash (``\``) and characters classified > as whitespace in the current version

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] GLEP 74 post-Council review update [v3]

W dniu czw, 16.11.2017 o godzinie 11∶19 +0100, użytkownik Michał Górny napisał: > Hi, everyone. > > Here's the updated version of GLEP 74 taking into consideration > the points made during the Council pre-review. > > ReST: https://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/tmp/glep-0074.rst > HTML: https://dev.gento

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] GLEP 74 post-Council review update [v2]

W dniu pon, 20.11.2017 o godzinie 22∶37 +0100, użytkownik Ulrich Mueller napisał: > > > > > > On Mon, 20 Nov 2017, Michał Górny wrote: > > New changes: > > 9d819c9 glep-0074: Disallow filenames containing whitespace > > 4124b2f glep-0074: Explicitly specify UTF-8 encoding > > 7f9bd9f glep-0074: Inc

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] GLEP 74 post-Council review update [v2]

> On Mon, 20 Nov 2017, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > On Mon, 20 Nov 2017, Michał Górny wrote: >> All paths specified in the Manifest file must consist of characters >> corresponding to valid UTF-8 code points excluding the NULL character >> (``U+``) and characters classified as whitespace in

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] GLEP 74 post-Council review update [v2]

> On Mon, 20 Nov 2017, Michał Górny wrote: > New changes: > 9d819c9 glep-0074: Disallow filenames containing whitespace > 4124b2f glep-0074: Explicitly specify UTF-8 encoding > 7f9bd9f glep-0074: Include suggestions from Daniel Campbell Here are a few comments (quoting below only the parts o

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] GLEP 74 post-Council review update [v2]

W dniu czw, 16.11.2017 o godzinie 11∶19 +0100, użytkownik Michał Górny napisał: > Hi, everyone. > > Here's the updated version of GLEP 74 taking into consideration > the points made during the Council pre-review. > > ReST: https://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/tmp/glep-0074.rst > HTML: https://dev.gento

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] GLEP 74 post-Council review update

W dniu pią, 17.11.2017 o godzinie 12∶37 -0800, użytkownik Daniel Campbell napisał: > > > > [snip] > > Non-strict Manifest verification > > > > > > Originally the Manifest2 format provided a special ``MISC`` tag that > > was used for ``metadata.xml`` and ``ChangeLo

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] GLEP 74 post-Council review update

On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 11:19:54AM +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > [snip] > Abstract > > > This GLEP extends the Manifest file format to cover full-tree file > integrity and authenticity checks.The format aims to be future-proof, Missing a space after the first sentence, between "checks." a