On 6/13/07, Thilo Bangert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I want a gentoo-kindergarten list, where useless discussions like this
(sub)thread can be directed to.
kids, grow up!
*cries in his corner*
Yes mummy
:]
--
Kent
ruby -e '[1, 2, 4, 7, 0, 9, 5, 8, 3, 10, 11, 6, 12, 13].each{|x|
print "enNO
I want a gentoo-kindergarten list, where useless discussions like this
(sub)thread can be directed to.
kids, grow up!
pgpJFDJFTgIVf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Mike Doty wrote:
George Prowse wrote:
Kumba wrote:
Kumba wrote:
So I'm told debian has one of these types of MLs, probably where the
flames burn bright enough to have earned a star designation from the
IAU. Given what's been going on lately, and with calls from myself
and others (i.e., mcummi
Mike Doty wrote:
George Prowse wrote:
Kumba wrote:
Kumba wrote:
So I'm told debian has one of these types of MLs, probably where the
flames burn bright enough to have earned a star designation from the
IAU. Given what's been going on lately, and with calls from myself
and others (i.e., mcummi
George Prowse wrote:
> Kumba wrote:
>> Kumba wrote:
>>>
>>> So I'm told debian has one of these types of MLs, probably where the
>>> flames burn bright enough to have earned a star designation from the
>>> IAU. Given what's been going on lately, and with calls from myself
>>> and others (i.e., mcu
Kumba wrote:
Kumba wrote:
So I'm told debian has one of these types of MLs, probably where the
flames burn bright enough to have earned a star designation from the
IAU. Given what's been going on lately, and with calls from myself
and others (i.e., mcummings) to get back on track and actual
Kumba wrote:
So I'm told debian has one of these types of MLs, probably where the
flames burn bright enough to have earned a star designation from the
IAU. Given what's been going on lately, and with calls from myself and
others (i.e., mcummings) to get back on track and actually like, you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kumba wrote:
> Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh wrote:
>> We might need some sort of enforcement for that particular purpose.
>> While I think that "behavior" proctors are inappropriate, I think that
>> people with ability to say "move this thread to gentoo-p
Kumba wrote:
> gentoo-politics
> gentoo-circuits
> gentoo-soap
> gentoo-project
> gentoo-gossip
gentoo-drama - theatrical events every day, no feeling were hurt while
filming the show*
gentoo-chats - mindless discussions about non issues
gentoo-rhetorics - exercise your language skills
gentoo-p
Kumba wrote:
> >> what should we call it? Vote on this!
> >
> > If users have votes ...
Then I'd vote for gentoo-project.
It seems to me that politics covers just a part of all possible non-technical
topics. Depends on how you define politics though.
Roman
pgpUqVXAIRKN3.pgp
Description: PGP
Philip Webb wrote:
070607 Kumba wrote:
what should we call it? Vote on this!
If users have votes ...
Since I'm pretty much the pikachu-loving nutball that proposed this, I don't see
why not. Users are as much a part of Gentoo as the developers are.
--Kumba
--
Gentoo/MIPS Team Lead
"S
070607 Kumba wrote:
> what should we call it? Vote on this!
If users have votes ...
> gentoo-politics
... that gets mine: let's keep it quite clear what it is.
--
,,
SUPPORT ___//___, Philip Webb : [EMAIL PROTECT
Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh wrote:
We might need some sort of enforcement for that particular purpose.
While I think that "behavior" proctors are inappropriate, I think that
people with ability to say "move this thread to gentoo-politics or else.."
for non-technical threads, as well as "stop failin
Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh wrote:
> Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
>> Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh wrote:
>>> Marius Mauch wrote:
Do you really think people would voluntarily use it? That's an
>> honest question, maybe people are fair enough to do it, but I have
>> serious doubts about it. It's of no u
Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
> Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh wrote:
> > Marius Mauch wrote:
> >> Do you really think people would voluntarily use it? That's an
> honest question, maybe people are fair enough to do it, but I have
> serious doubts about it. It's of no use if people have to be told to
> move
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Jun 2007 11:50:02 -0500
> Steev Klimaszewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> No can do - temporarily banning is a bad thing, its censorship, and we
>> can't have that, no sir.
>
> It's censorship when it's being done one-sidedly in order to skew an
> argument base
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Jun 2007 11:50:02 -0500
> Steev Klimaszewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> No can do - temporarily banning is a bad thing, its censorship, and we
>> can't have that, no sir.
>>
>
> It's censorship when it's being done one-sidedly in order to skew an
> a
On Thu, 07 Jun 2007 11:50:02 -0500
Steev Klimaszewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No can do - temporarily banning is a bad thing, its censorship, and we
> can't have that, no sir.
It's censorship when it's being done one-sidedly in order to skew an
argument based upon the prejudices of those doin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh wrote:
> Marius Mauch wrote:
>> Do you really think people would voluntarily use it? That's an honest
>> question, maybe people are fair enough to do it, but I have serious doubts
>> about it. It's of no use if people have t
070607 Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh wrote:
> people with ability to say "move this to gentoo-politics or else.."
> for non-technical threads, as well as "stop failing to use logic
> in your technical discussion or else..." with power
> to temporarily ban people for non-compliance could be a useful thi
Marius Mauch wrote:
> Do you really think people would voluntarily use it? That's an honest
> question, maybe people are fair enough to do it, but I have serious doubts
> about it. It's of no use if people have to be told to move threads from -dev
> to that new list.
>
We might need some sort
Marius Mauch wrote:
Do you really think people would voluntarily use it? That's an honest question,
maybe people are fair enough to do it, but I have serious doubts about it. It's
of no use if people have to be told to move threads from -dev to that new list.
Most of what I wrote was tongue
Luca Barbato wrote:
I'm ok with it, just I'd like to have it available as gentoo-fortune please.
(btw I'd like to see the quotebot back from the old ages!)
Oh, I could easily see the quote package for gentoo-politics (or whatever its
called) raising much laughter (among other things).
And
Christian Parpart wrote:
+1 here too
possible alternative names: gentoo-soap, gentoo-gossip ( not to be
confused with net-im/gossip )
gentoo-soap, lol!
"And these are the Flames of our Lives..."
--Kumba
--
Gentoo/MIPS Team Lead
"Such is oft the course of deeds that move the wheels
On Thu, 07 Jun 2007 02:19:55 -0400
Kumba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So I'm told debian has one of these types of MLs, probably where the flames
> burn
> bright enough to have earned a star designation from the IAU. Given what's
> been
> going on lately, and with calls from myself and oth
Kent Fredric wrote:
> possible alternative names: gentoo-soap, gentoo-gossip ( not to be
> confused with net-im/gossip )
Please, please, make it gentoo-circuits [1].
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All_My_Circuits
Yours faithfully,
-jkt
--
cd /local/pub && more beer > /dev/mouth
signature.
On Thursday 07 June 2007 09:10:41 Kent Fredric wrote:
> On 6/7/07, Kumba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Anyways, thoughts?
> >
> > --Kumba
>
> +1
+1 here too
> possible alternative names: gentoo-soap, gentoo-gossip ( not to be
> confused with net-im/gossip )
gentoo-soap, lol!
signature.asc
Des
Kumba wrote:
> So anyways, I'm all for this list, humour aside. It's blatantly obvious
> people need a place to vent at times, and I think that by separating the
> politics from the technical discussion, it might help in some way. Yes,
> it'll also be the source of many problems too. I can't env
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kumba wrote:
> And maybe a dev who
> secretly dabbles in another OSlike Wind...err, Ubuntu!
I thought this position has been already filled :)
- --
Vlastimil Babka (Caster)
Gentoo/Java
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux
On 6/7/07, Kumba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anyways, thoughts?
--Kumba
+1
possible alternative names: gentoo-soap, gentoo-gossip ( not to be
confused with net-im/gossip )
And just for fits and giggles, the occasional person can start a fake
flame war just to keep us on our toes as to whats
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kumba wrote:
>
> So I'm told debian has one of these types of MLs, probably where the
> flames burn bright enough to have earned a star designation from the
> IAU. Given what's been going on lately, and with calls from myself and
> others (i.e., mcum
31 matches
Mail list logo
