On 02/06/2024 18.40, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Sun, 02 Jun 2024, Florian Schmaus wrote:
IMHO that's a very bad idea and will probably break ebuilds that rely
on the current behaviour.
I pondered about this and its one of the reasons I'd rather start with
a fresh eclass.
That said, worst c
> On Sun, 02 Jun 2024, Florian Schmaus wrote:
>> IMHO that's a very bad idea and will probably break ebuilds that rely
>> on the current behaviour.
> I pondered about this and its one of the reasons I'd rather start with
> a fresh eclass.
> That said, worst case scenario I could came up with
On 02/06/2024 17.25, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Sun, 02 Jun 2024, Florian Schmaus wrote:
Note that this changes readme.gentoo-r1.eclass to export phase
functions when it previously did not.
IMHO that's a very bad idea and will probably break ebuilds that rely
on the current behaviour.
I pond
> On Sun, 02 Jun 2024, Florian Schmaus wrote:
> Note that this changes readme.gentoo-r1.eclass to export phase
> functions when it previously did not.
IMHO that's a very bad idea and will probably break ebuilds that rely
on the current behaviour.
(Also, readme.gentoo.eclass used to export ph
