Mike Gilbert writes:
> On Sun, Jun 25, 2023 at 2:52 PM Michał Górny wrote:
>>
>> I think a better approach would be to always include $? in die messages
>> in Portage.
>
> It's a nice idea, but will not work in the case where die is not
> called immediately after the failing command.
>
> A coup
On Sun, Jun 25, 2023 at 2:52 PM Michał Górny wrote:
>
> I think a better approach would be to always include $? in die messages
> in Portage.
It's a nice idea, but will not work in the case where die is not
called immediately after the failing command.
A couple of possible workarounds that could
On Sun, Jun 25, 2023 at 20:52:53 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> I think a better approach would be to always include $? in die messages
> in Portage.
>
I'm not sure the exit code is useful in the general case. Something like
rm(1) seems to give the same exit code despite failing for different
reaso
I think a better approach would be to always include $? in die messages
in Portage.
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
