On 17 July 2015 at 22:34, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> 2. Add an optional feature to emerge (or even to PMS?) allowing user
> to provide a usable GPG key for signing packages CONTENTS files
> after its generation. In order for such key to be usable during
> emerge run, gpg-agent should be used; alter
Hi,
On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 10:18:14 +0200 Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> > Additionally, I feel that a signature is a means of acknowledging
> > that a package has been looked over, and that developer has stated
> > that they approve of the existing state. I'm not sure if others
> > agree with that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 07/17/2015 11:48 AM, hasufell wrote:
> On 07/17/2015 10:18 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>> On 07/17/2015 03:13 AM, NP-Hardass wrote:
>>
>>> Additionally, I feel that a signature is a means of
>>> acknowledging that a package has been looked o
On 07/17/2015 10:18 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> On 07/17/2015 03:13 AM, NP-Hardass wrote:
>
>> Additionally, I feel that a signature is a means of acknowledging
>> that a package has been looked over, and that developer has stated
>> that they approve of the existing state. I'm not sure if
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 07/17/2015 03:13 AM, NP-Hardass wrote:
> Additionally, I feel that a signature is a means of acknowledging
> that a package has been looked over, and that developer has stated
> that they approve of the existing state. I'm not sure if others
> a
