Hello
I would know what finally occurred with:
http://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org/msg31489.html
Seems that last comment was:
http://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org/msg31502.html
and, after that, activity stopped
Is there any problem for having this "USE cle
2008/11/4 Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> bonjour is Apple specific branding for zeroconf. This is another case
> that needs to be changed.
I just came up with this as nobody mentioned it before :-)
> zeroconf/avahi/howl/bonjour/mdnsresponder all need to be condensed.
++ one flag for all i
Daniel Gryniewicz a écrit :
> I agree. Let's just have zeroconf.
+1, zeroconf is what it should be called, regardless of different
implementations (especially if they are compatible).
Cheers
--
Rémi Cardona
LRI, INRIA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 15:44 -0500, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> bonjour is Apple specific branding for zeroconf. This is another case
> that needs to be changed.
>
> zeroconf/avahi/howl/bonjour/mdnsresponder all need to be condensed.
>
I agree. Let's just have zeroconf.
Daniel
Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
> Doug Goldstein schrieb am 04.11.2008 18:11:
>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> A few ebuilds treat things differently with regard to this situation and
>> it really needs to get rectified.
>>
>> net-misc/ntp
>> zeroconf? ( || ( net-dns/avahi net-misc/mDNSResponder ) )
>>
>> net-pr
Doug Goldstein schrieb am 04.11.2008 18:11:
> Hey all,
>
> A few ebuilds treat things differently with regard to this situation and
> it really needs to get rectified.
>
> net-misc/ntp
> zeroconf? ( || ( net-dns/avahi net-misc/mDNSResponder ) )
>
> net-print/cups
> zeroconf? ( !avahi? (
Hey all,
A few ebuilds treat things differently with regard to this situation and
it really needs to get rectified.
net-misc/ntp
zeroconf? ( || ( net-dns/avahi net-misc/mDNSResponder ) )
net-print/cups
zeroconf? ( !avahi? ( net-misc/mDNSResponder ) )
avahi? ( net-dns/avahi )
kde-bas
Le mardi 04 novembre 2008 à 12:11 -0500, Doug Goldstein a écrit :
> Hey all,
>
> A few ebuilds treat things differently with regard to this situation
> and
> it really needs to get rectified.
[snip]
> Maybe we should clean the whole thing up and do like net-misc/ntp does
> it. Thoughts?
since I'm
