Re: [gentoo-dev] x86 toolchain changes heads up

2007-07-19 Thread Peter Gordon
On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 01:53 -0700, Peter Gordon wrote: > Does this mean that any user-set "-march" flag is overridden for these > cases? Just curious. Thanks for the explanations given, Mike, Ioannis, Ryan, and Andre! I'm much clearer on the isue now. :] -- Peter Gordon (codergeek42) Gentoo Forum

Re: [gentoo-dev] x86 toolchain changes heads up

2007-07-18 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wednesday 18 July 2007, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 19:47 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > historically, gcc on x86 has always defaulted to i386. some people > > noticed recently that glibc-2.6 fails to build in this situation as they > > were only setting -mtune via CFLAGS,

Re: [gentoo-dev] x86 toolchain changes heads up

2007-07-18 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 19:47 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > historically, gcc on x86 has always defaulted to i386. some people noticed > recently that glibc-2.6 fails to build in this situation as they were only > setting -mtune via CFLAGS, not -march. i'll be tweaking gcc so that it will > def

Re: [gentoo-dev] x86 toolchain changes heads up

2007-07-18 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wednesday 18 July 2007, Peter Gordon wrote: > On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 19:47 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > historically, gcc on x86 has always defaulted to i386. some people > > noticed recently that glibc-2.6 fails to build in this situation as they > > were only setting -mtune via CFLAGS, not

Re: [gentoo-dev] x86 toolchain changes heads up

2007-07-18 Thread Andrew Gaffney
Peter Gordon wrote: On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 19:47 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: historically, gcc on x86 has always defaulted to i386. some people noticed recently that glibc-2.6 fails to build in this situation as they were only setting -mtune via CFLAGS, not -march. i'll be tweaking gcc so tha

Re: [gentoo-dev] x86 toolchain changes heads up

2007-07-18 Thread Tobias Klausmann
Hi! On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Mike Frysinger wrote: > historically, gcc on x86 has always defaulted to i386. some people noticed > recently that glibc-2.6 fails to build in this situation as they were only > setting -mtune via CFLAGS, not -march. i'll be tweaking gcc so that it will > default -ma

Re: [gentoo-dev] x86 toolchain changes heads up

2007-07-18 Thread Vlastimil Babka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Peter Gordon wrote: > On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 19:47 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> historically, gcc on x86 has always defaulted to i386. some people noticed >> recently that glibc-2.6 fails to build in this situation as they were only >> setting -mt

Re: [gentoo-dev] x86 toolchain changes heads up

2007-07-18 Thread Ioannis Aslanidis
I think it's the other way arround. -march=ix86 is implicit unless you override it with a user variable. On 7/18/07, Peter Gordon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 19:47 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > historically, gcc on x86 has always defaulted to i386. some people noticed > re

Re: [gentoo-dev] x86 toolchain changes heads up

2007-07-18 Thread Peter Gordon
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 19:47 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > historically, gcc on x86 has always defaulted to i386. some people noticed > recently that glibc-2.6 fails to build in this situation as they were only > setting -mtune via CFLAGS, not -march. i'll be tweaking gcc so that it will > def

[gentoo-dev] x86 toolchain changes heads up

2007-07-17 Thread Mike Frysinger
historically, gcc on x86 has always defaulted to i386. some people noticed recently that glibc-2.6 fails to build in this situation as they were only setting -mtune via CFLAGS, not -march. i'll be tweaking gcc so that it will default -march based on your CHOST. so all the i686-* people will n