On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 11:06 PM, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 9:44 AM, Petteri Räty wrote:
>> On 03/24/2010 08:30 PM, Peter Hjalmarsson wrote:
>>
>>> For qemu-kvm the problem is that there is only one implementation (i.e.
>>> gnutls), and if I want to have ssl support I have t
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 9:44 AM, Petteri Räty wrote:
> On 03/24/2010 08:30 PM, Peter Hjalmarsson wrote:
>
>> For qemu-kvm the problem is that there is only one implementation (i.e.
>> gnutls), and if I want to have ssl support I have to enable gnutls for
>> this package.
>
> In this case the ebuil
On 03/24/2010 08:30 PM, Peter Hjalmarsson wrote:
> For qemu-kvm the problem is that there is only one implementation (i.e.
> gnutls), and if I want to have ssl support I have to enable gnutls for
> this package.
In this case the ebuild should have only ssl use flag.
> When I wrote a bug about th
I took a look at qemu-kvm and found something I percieve as funny:
It had a gnutls use-flag, but no ssl useflag.
As I see it is I want ssl/tls support it should be sufficient to enable
USE="ssl" and let the maintainer of said ebuild decide which
implementation (if more then one) I am better off wi
