On Mon, 2017-07-24 at 12:10 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>
> Similarly, if we get rid of the vim-syntax flag, should we phase out
> the emacs USE flag, too?
I would say no because in almost all cases the emacs code needs to be
compiled and that requires emacs to be present.
As far as I understan
On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Ciaran McCreesh
wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Jul 2017 16:27:39 -0400
> Mike Gilbert wrote:
>> Packages currently handle installation of vim syntax support files
>> inconsistently. Some builds install the files if the "vim-syntax" USE
>> flag is enabled, while others insta
> On Mon, 24 Jul 2017, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>> The flag also pulls in additional dependencies for some ebuilds.
>> So I wonder how it could be made unconditional? For example,
>> app-admin/eselect[vim-syntax] depends on app-vim/eselect-syntax
>> which in turn will pull in vim or gvim. Certainly
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 6:10 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> On Sat, 22 Jul 2017, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>
>> Packages currently handle installation of vim syntax support files
>> inconsistently. Some builds install the files if the "vim-syntax"
>> USE flag is enabled, while others install them unco
> On Sat, 22 Jul 2017, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> Packages currently handle installation of vim syntax support files
> inconsistently. Some builds install the files if the "vim-syntax"
> USE flag is enabled, while others install them unconditionally.
> Do these files fall into the "small text file
On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 05:46:04PM +0300, Andrew Savchenko wrote
> On Sat, 22 Jul 2017 22:00:16 +0100 Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> > On Sat, 22 Jul 2017 16:27:39 -0400
> > Mike Gilbert wrote:
> >
> > > Packages currently handle installation of vim syntax support files
> > > inconsistently. Some bu
On Sat, 22 Jul 2017 16:27:39 -0400
Mike Gilbert wrote:
> Packages currently handle installation of vim syntax support files
> inconsistently. Some builds install the files if the "vim-syntax" USE
> flag is enabled, while others install them unconditionally.
>
> Do these files fall into the "small
On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Patrice Clement wrote:
> Hi Mike
>
> Saturday 22 Jul 2017 16:27:39, Mike Gilbert wrote :
>> Packages currently handle installation of vim syntax support files
>> inconsistently. Some builds install the files if the "vim-syntax" USE
>> flag is enabled, while others
On nie, 2017-07-23 at 17:46 +0300, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Jul 2017 22:00:16 +0100 Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> > On Sat, 22 Jul 2017 16:27:39 -0400
> > Mike Gilbert wrote:
> >
> > > Packages currently handle installation of vim syntax support files
> > > inconsistently. Some builds i
On Sat, 22 Jul 2017 22:00:16 +0100 Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Jul 2017 16:27:39 -0400
> Mike Gilbert wrote:
>
> > Packages currently handle installation of vim syntax support files
> > inconsistently. Some builds install the files if the "vim-syntax" USE
> > flag is enabled, while oth
Hi Mike
Saturday 22 Jul 2017 16:27:39, Mike Gilbert wrote :
> Packages currently handle installation of vim syntax support files
> inconsistently. Some builds install the files if the "vim-syntax" USE
> flag is enabled, while others install them unconditionally.
>
> Do these files fall into the "
On 07/22/2017 01:27 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> Packages currently handle installation of vim syntax support files
> inconsistently. Some builds install the files if the "vim-syntax" USE
> flag is enabled, while others install them unconditionally.
>
> Do these files fall into the "small text files"
On Sat, 22 Jul 2017 16:27:39 -0400
Mike Gilbert wrote:
> Packages currently handle installation of vim syntax support files
> inconsistently. Some builds install the files if the "vim-syntax" USE
> flag is enabled, while others install them unconditionally.
>
> Do these files fall into the "smal
Packages currently handle installation of vim syntax support files
inconsistently. Some builds install the files if the "vim-syntax" USE
flag is enabled, while others install them unconditionally.
Do these files fall into the "small text files" category for
unconditional installation? If so, we sh
14 matches
Mail list logo