On May 30, 2017 10:09:14 AM GMT+02:00, Kristian Fiskerstrand
wrote:
>On 05/30/2017 12:05 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>> -- So all packages that a) use gcc-4 or gcc-5, and b) do not in the
>ebuild
>> "manually" add something like -std=c++11 or -std=c++14 or -std=gnu14
>will fail
>> to *build*.
On 05/30/2017 12:05 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> -- So all packages that a) use gcc-4 or gcc-5, and b) do not in the ebuild
> "manually" add something like -std=c++11 or -std=c++14 or -std=gnu14 will
> fail
> to *build*.
This isn't really different from [Qt 5.7 requirements] and is
fundament
Am Montag, 29. Mai 2017, 19:32:48 CEST schrieb Walter Dnes:
>
> The irc log mentions problems with some ebuilds under some versions of
> GCC. In a similar vein, are there any anticipated issues with binaries
> built under older GCC versions running on a system that is otherwise
> all-GCC-6.3.0
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 08:29:59PM +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote
> On 05/26/2017 08:07 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > A bit late to the party, but what was the outcome of the meeting, esp.
> > this part ?
>
> Unofficial log from meeting:
> https://download.sumptuouscapital.com/gentoo/tmp/gento
On 05/26/2017 08:07 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> A bit late to the party, but what was the outcome of the meeting, esp.
> this part ?
Unofficial log from meeting:
https://download.sumptuouscapital.com/gentoo/tmp/gentoo-toolchain.log.txt
--
Kristian Fiskerstrand
OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp:/
On Fri, May 26, 2017, at 13:07 CDT, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Sat, 20 May 2017 19:38:01 +0200
> "Andreas K. Huettel" wrote:
>> - Globally setting -std=c++14 in upcoming 17.0 profiles
>
> A bit late to the party, but what was the outcome of the meeting, esp.
> this part ?
>
> I'm not sure if d
On Sat, 20 May 2017 19:38:01 +0200
"Andreas K. Huettel" wrote:
> - Globally setting -std=c++14 in upcoming 17.0 profiles
A bit late to the party, but what was the outcome of the meeting, esp.
this part ?
I'm not sure if default CXXFLAGS would make such a difference since
most people would overr
So here's the agenda. It's been mostly assembled by tamiko, who may
unfortunately not make it tonight. I'll try to stand in...
- a short hello :-)
- Outstanding CVEs for binutils, elfutils, gcc, and glibc [1]
* Who handled CVEs in the past?
* Who wants to take care of individual packages
