Mike,
I think you have a good plan. Retiring the 2.4 headers sounds like the
right thing to do. Building glibc against 2.6 and enabling backwards
compatibility with older kernels should not be problematic. It all
sounds good from a maintainability and stability perspective.
Nothing should break
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> now that the 2.6 headers have entered a sane state and are *quite* nice to
I'm looking forward to see the cvs log of the removal of 2.4
lu
--
Luca Barbato
Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
now that the 2.6 headers have entered a sane state and are *quite* nice to
work with, i have no inclination whatsoever to touch unsanitized headers
(keep your puns to yourself :p)
so here's the question i pose: what to do ?
people file bug reports saying "package FOO fails to build with linux-2
