On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Aaron W. Swenson wrote:
> On 2014-08-22 14:07, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Aaron W. Swenson
>> wrote:
>> > On the whole, I'm displeased with the systemd alternative for
>> > controlling PostgreSQL. It's significantly hampered and doesn
On 2014-09-01 11:09, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Aaron W. Swenson
> wrote:
> > On 2014-08-22 14:07, Rich Freeman wrote:
> >> On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Aaron W. Swenson
> >> wrote:
> >> > On the whole, I'm displeased with the systemd alternative for
> >>
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Aaron W. Swenson wrote:
> On 2014-08-22 14:07, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Aaron W. Swenson
>> wrote:
>> > On the whole, I'm displeased with the systemd alternative for
>> > controlling PostgreSQL. It's significantly hampered and doesn
On 2014-08-22 14:07, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Aaron W. Swenson
> wrote:
> > On the whole, I'm displeased with the systemd alternative for
> > controlling PostgreSQL. It's significantly hampered and doesn't allow
> > as much flexibility as the initscript. The major is
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Aaron W. Swenson
> wrote:
>> On the whole, I'm displeased with the systemd alternative for
>> controlling PostgreSQL. It's significantly hampered and doesn't allow
>> as much flexibility as the initscript. Th
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Aaron W. Swenson
> wrote:
>> On the whole, I'm displeased with the systemd alternative for
>> controlling PostgreSQL. It's significantly hampered and doesn't allow
>> as much flexibility as the initscript. Th
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Aaron W. Swenson wrote:
> On the whole, I'm displeased with the systemd alternative for
> controlling PostgreSQL. It's significantly hampered and doesn't allow
> as much flexibility as the initscript. The major issue being trying to
> nicely shut down the server in
On 2014-07-15 08:52, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> On 15/07/14 07:36 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > El mar, 15-07-2014 a las 13:31 +0200, Alexander Berntsen escribió:
> > [...]
> >> To alleviate this I needed to run "systemd-tmpfiles --create".
> >> This was non-obvious to me. Sounds like a packaging issu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 15/07/14 07:36 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El mar, 15-07-2014 a las 13:31 +0200, Alexander Berntsen escribió:
> [...]
>> To alleviate this I needed to run "systemd-tmpfiles --create".
>> This was non-obvious to me. Sounds like a packaging issue that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 15/07/14 13:36, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> It's: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=462118
Thank you for the info.
> The problem is that it's not clear to us how to make it
> automatically without needing to call it manually from every
> ebuild i
El mar, 15-07-2014 a las 07:40 -0400, Rich Freeman escribió:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 7:36 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > El mar, 15-07-2014 a las 13:31 +0200, Alexander Berntsen escribió:
> > [...]
> >> To alleviate this I needed to run "systemd-tmpfiles --create". This
> >> was non-obvious to me. S
El mar, 15-07-2014 a las 13:31 +0200, Alexander Berntsen escribió:
[...]
> To alleviate this I needed to run "systemd-tmpfiles --create". This
> was non-obvious to me. Sounds like a packaging issue that I need to do
> it in the first place?
It's:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=462118
The
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
# emerge postgresql-server
...
# emerge --config dev-db/postgresql-server:9.3
...
# systemctl start postgresql-server-9.3
Job for postgresql-9.3.service failed. See 'systemctl status
postgresql-9.3.service' and 'journalctl -xn' for details.
13 matches
Mail list logo