On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 06:31:06PM -0500, Andrew Gaffney wrote:
> It seems that not everybody loves the new "DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL"
> header at the top of every bugzie email as much as robbat2 does. Because of
> that, robbat2, KingTaco, and I came up with a procmail recipe that uses sed
> t
On Saturday 29 September 2007, Andrew Gaffney wrote:
> Benno Schulenberg wrote:
> > Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> >> DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL. Also, do not reply via email to the
> >> person whose email is mentioned below. To comment on this bug,
> >> please visit:
> >
> > Please consider lowercasing
Benno Schulenberg wrote:
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL. Also, do not reply via email to the
person whose email is mentioned below. To comment on this bug,
please visit:
Please consider lowercasing the first sentence, to stop the yelling,
and removing the repetition from t
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL. Also, do not reply via email to the
> person whose email is mentioned below. To comment on this bug,
> please visit:
Please consider lowercasing the first sentence, to stop the yelling,
and removing the repetition from the second sentence, whi
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 07:05:31AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> no, his MUA isnt broken ... when comments get added, there are 5 blank lines
> between the bugzilla URI's and the start of actual content ...
Those existed before the change.
> > Otherwise, take a screenshot of before and after to
On Saturday 29 September 2007, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 11:58:33AM +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Most annoying is the many empty lines for normal comment mails that were
> > added. You *must* scroll down now to just read the contents. Just
> > removing
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 11:58:33AM +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> Thanks.
>
> Most annoying is the many empty lines for normal comment mails that were
> added. You *must* scroll down now to just read the contents. Just
> removing those from the template (like it used to be, and is for the
> othe
On 29-09-2007 02:29:21 -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 09:23:21AM +0200, Thilo Bangert wrote:
> > Andrew Gaffney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > > It seems that not everybody loves the new "DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL"
> > > header at the top of every bugzie email as much as r
On 28-09-2007 18:31:06 -0500, Andrew Gaffney wrote:
> It seems that not everybody loves the new "DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL"
> header at the top of every bugzie email as much as robbat2 does. Because of
> that, robbat2, KingTaco, and I came up with a procmail recipe that uses sed
> to filter tha
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 09:23:21AM +0200, Thilo Bangert wrote:
> Andrew Gaffney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > It seems that not everybody loves the new "DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL"
> > header at the top of every bugzie email as much as robbat2 does.
> 1. if everybody hates it (full ack btw), why no
Andrew Gaffney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> It seems that not everybody loves the new "DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL"
> header at the top of every bugzie email as much as robbat2 does.
1. if everybody hates it (full ack btw), why not remove it globally?
2. why doesn't bugzi receive mail (anymore?)?
Andrew Gaffney wrote:
It seems that not everybody loves the new "DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL"
header at the top of every bugzie email as much as robbat2 does. Because
of that, robbat2, KingTaco, and I came up with a procmail recipe that
uses sed to filter that new message out of bugzie emails.
It seems that not everybody loves the new "DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL" header at
the top of every bugzie email as much as robbat2 does. Because of that, robbat2,
KingTaco, and I came up with a procmail recipe that uses sed to filter that new
message out of bugzie emails.
This has not actually
13 matches
Mail list logo
