On Sat, Feb 2, 2013, at 02:24 PM, Dustin C. Hatch wrote:
> On 2/2/2013 13:19, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > El mar, 29-01-2013 a las 15:55 +0400, Sergey Popov escribió:
> >> 28.01.2013 23:26, Pacho Ramos пишет:
> >>> Then, looks like no alternative is in good shape on Gentoo. What is
> >>> Sabayon using
On 2/2/2013 13:19, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El mar, 29-01-2013 a las 15:55 +0400, Sergey Popov escribió:
28.01.2013 23:26, Pacho Ramos пишет:
Then, looks like no alternative is in good shape on Gentoo. What is
Sabayon using? They look to have plymouth ebuilds in their overlay (but
not in "for-gentoo"
El mar, 29-01-2013 a las 15:55 +0400, Sergey Popov escribió:
> 28.01.2013 23:26, Pacho Ramos пишет:
> > Then, looks like no alternative is in good shape on Gentoo. What is
> > Sabayon using? They look to have plymouth ebuilds in their overlay (but
> > not in "for-gentoo" one, then, it probably has
28.01.2013 23:26, Pacho Ramos пишет:
> Then, looks like no alternative is in good shape on Gentoo. What is
> Sabayon using? They look to have plymouth ebuilds in their overlay (but
> not in "for-gentoo" one, then, it probably has some incompatibility
> Gentoo :/)
We have plymouth ebuilds in tree,
Hi all!
Well, I think best solution for fbcondecor patch is to go mainline. May be
after that there will be some interest fro maintaining splashutils from non-
gentoo people.
В письме от 27 января 2013 23:06:35 пользователь Pacho Ramos написал:
> With spock retirement, splashutils became orphan.
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El lun, 28-01-2013 a las 00:25 +0100, Alex Legler escribió:
>
> Then, looks like no alternative is in good shape on Gentoo. What is
> Sabayon using? They look to have plymouth ebuilds in their overlay (but
> not in "for-gentoo" one, then, it pr
El lun, 28-01-2013 a las 00:25 +0100, Alex Legler escribió:
> On 27.01.2013 23:06, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > With spock retirement, splashutils became orphan. The problem is that it
> > has a lot of unresolved bugs for a long time:
> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=splashutils&list_i
On 27.01.2013 23:06, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> With spock retirement, splashutils became orphan. The problem is that it
> has a lot of unresolved bugs for a long time:
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=splashutils&list_id=1521218
>
> that would need someone with more knowledge about it
With spock retirement, splashutils became orphan. The problem is that it
has a lot of unresolved bugs for a long time:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=splashutils&list_id=1521218
that would need someone with more knowledge about it to maintain it (as
I don't have splash on my syste
